Mass balance of nitrogen, and estimates of COD, nitrogen and phosphorus used in microbial synthesis as a function of sludge retention time in a sequencing batch reactor system

This study investigated characteristics of a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) system which was varied with respect to sludge retention time (SRT) (5.9, 8.2, 10.5, 12.2, and 16.2 days). The removal efficiencies of chemical oxygen demand (COD) were more than 90% under all SRT conditions, and the greates...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioresource technology 2008-11, Vol.99 (16), p.7788-7796
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Jae-Kune, Choi, Chang-Kyoo, Lee, Kwang-Ho, Yim, Soo-Bin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study investigated characteristics of a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) system which was varied with respect to sludge retention time (SRT) (5.9, 8.2, 10.5, 12.2, and 16.2 days). The removal efficiencies of chemical oxygen demand (COD) were more than 90% under all SRT conditions, and the greatest efficiency (92.2%) occurred with a SRT of 16.2 days. As the SRT increased, the denitrification rate per mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) during the anoxic(I) period decreased significantly from 166.3mg NOX-–N/g MLSSd to 68.8mg NOX-–N/g MLSSd. As the SRT increased, the phosphorus removal efficiency decreased from 47.1% (SRT of 5.9 days) to 31.0% for a SRT of 16.2 days, because active phosphate release and uptake occurred under shorter SRT conditions. The mass balance of nitrogen (with respect to nitrogen in the influent) at a SRT of 16.2 days (the highest nitrogen removal efficiency) showed 14.9% of nitrogen was removed in clarified water effluent, 49.7% was removed by the sludge waste process and 33.3% was removed by denitrification. Nitrogen processing was well accounted for in the SBR system as the nitrogen mass balance was close to 100% (97.9%).
ISSN:0960-8524
1873-2976
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.057