Critical evaluation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging system for patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): A Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results (SEER) analysis

Background Recently, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) released its 8th edition changes to the staging system for hepatocellular cancer (HCC). We sought to validate the 8th edition staging system and compare the performance to the 7th edition using a population‐based data set. Methods Us...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of surgical oncology 2018-03, Vol.117 (4), p.644-650
Hauptverfasser: Kamarajah, Sivesh K., Frankel, Timothy L., Sonnenday, Christopher, Cho, Clifford S., Nathan, Hari
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Recently, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) released its 8th edition changes to the staging system for hepatocellular cancer (HCC). We sought to validate the 8th edition staging system and compare the performance to the 7th edition using a population‐based data set. Methods Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (1998‐2013), patients undergoing resection or transplant for non‐metastatic HCC were identified. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan‐Meier method and compared using log‐rank tests. Concordance indices (c‐indices) were calculated from Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate discriminatory power. Results The study included 8918 patients resected (63%) or transplanted (37%) for HCC. Nodal staging was performed in 19%, of whom 5% had positive nodes. The c‐index for the AJCC 8th edition staging system was 0.60, similar to that for the 7th edition (0.59). Survival was better for solitary tumors >2 cm with vascular invasion than for multifocal tumors
ISSN:0022-4790
1096-9098
DOI:10.1002/jso.24908