Utility of multi-detector computed tomography scans after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective study

Several reports have described major adverse events after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), such as perforation or bleeding. However, few studies have discussed the occurrence of post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) after colorectal ESD. In addition, the occurrence of fever without abd...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2018-03, Vol.87 (3), p.818-826
Hauptverfasser: Kobayashi, Ryosuke, Hirasawa, Kingo, Sato, Chiko, Makazu, Makomo, Kaneko, Hiroaki, Ikeda, Ryosuke, Fukuchi, Takehide, Sawada, Atsushi, Ozeki, Yuichiro, Taguri, Masataka, Takebayashi, Shigeo, Maeda, Shin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Several reports have described major adverse events after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), such as perforation or bleeding. However, few studies have discussed the occurrence of post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) after colorectal ESD. In addition, the occurrence of fever without abdominal pain in patients requires postoperative management similar to that required for PEECS. Therefore, we have defined post-ESD inflammatory syndrome (PEIS) composed of both PEECS and fever without abdominal pain. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between the findings of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) imaging and PEIS in patients. Between January 2015 and October 2015, we performed colorectal ESD in 100 patients; after this, all patients underwent abdominal examinations by MDCT scans. Nine patients who experienced intraoperative perforations or penetrations were excluded; 91 patients were enrolled in our prospective study. MDCT findings in patients were classified according to the amount of extraluminal gas. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of extraluminal gas and were assessed for co-occurring PEIS. Among the 91 patients, extraluminal gas was observed in 31 (34%); of these, PEIS occurred in 14 (15%) patients. Patients with extraluminal gas had increased incidence of PEIS compared with patients without extraluminal gas (29% vs 8%, P = .014). Extraluminal gas was detected by MDCT in many cases and significantly correlated with the occurrence of PEIS, even in cases without obvious intraoperative perforation or penetration. MDCT findings after ESD may be useful for predicting PEIS and appropriate perioperative management.
ISSN:0016-5107
1097-6779
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2017.10.038