Five-Year Outcomes after On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass

To the Editor: Shroyer et al. (Aug 17 issue) 1 report the 5-year outcomes of the Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) trial. They conclude that off-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) led to lower rates of 5-year survival and event-free survival than on-pump CABG. Although the authors allude to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 2017-11, Vol.377 (19), p.1896-1899
Hauptverfasser: Jones, Siôn G, Pullan, D. Mark, Kirmani, Bilal H, Taggart, David P, Puskas, John D, Jacob, Kirolos A, Gianoli, Monica, van Dijk, Diederik, Shroyer, A. Laurie, Hattler, Brack, Grover, Frederick L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To the Editor: Shroyer et al. (Aug 17 issue) 1 report the 5-year outcomes of the Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) trial. They conclude that off-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) led to lower rates of 5-year survival and event-free survival than on-pump CABG. Although the authors allude to criticism of the trial design that allowed inexperienced surgeons to participate in the off-pump part of the trial, this Achilles’ heel is inadequately explored. The sensitivity analysis, excluding numerous off-pump–to–on-pump conversions (12.4%, vs. a 2.2% national average; the higher rate is a surrogate marker of inexperience) obviated the risk from off-pump CABG. The authors . . .
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMc1712000