Five-Year Outcomes after On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass
To the Editor: Shroyer et al. (Aug 17 issue) 1 report the 5-year outcomes of the Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) trial. They conclude that off-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) led to lower rates of 5-year survival and event-free survival than on-pump CABG. Although the authors allude to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2017-11, Vol.377 (19), p.1896-1899 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To the Editor:
Shroyer et al. (Aug 17 issue)
1
report the 5-year outcomes of the Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) trial. They conclude that off-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) led to lower rates of 5-year survival and event-free survival than on-pump CABG. Although the authors allude to criticism of the trial design that allowed inexperienced surgeons to participate in the off-pump part of the trial, this Achilles’ heel is inadequately explored. The sensitivity analysis, excluding numerous off-pump–to–on-pump conversions (12.4%, vs. a 2.2% national average; the higher rate is a surrogate marker of inexperience) obviated the risk from off-pump CABG. The authors . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMc1712000 |