Asymmetric high-contrast masking in S cone increment and decrement pathways
Physiological, anatomical, and psychophysical evidence points to important differences between visual processing of short-wave cone increments and decrement (S+ and S−) stimuli. The present study uses the pedestal discrimination paradigm to investigate potential differences, using S+ and S− tests pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vision research (Oxford) 2018-10, Vol.151, p.61-68 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Physiological, anatomical, and psychophysical evidence points to important differences between visual processing of short-wave cone increments and decrement (S+ and S−) stimuli. The present study uses the pedestal discrimination paradigm to investigate potential differences, using S+ and S− tests presented on (L)ong-wave, (M)edium-wave, S, L+M, L−M, and achromatic pedestals, of both contrast polarities. Results show that high contrast ‘purplish’ (S+ or −(L+M)) pedestals produce substantially more masking of both S+ and S− tests than ‘yellowish’ (S− or +(L+M)) pedestals do. The other pedestals produce no masking. These findings suggest greater nonlinearity – either a static nonlinearity or contrast gain control – in the mechanisms responsible for the ‘purplish’ polarity, likely the S ON pathway. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0042-6989 1878-5646 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.visres.2017.06.017 |