Clinical guidelines for low back pain: A critical review of consensus and inconsistencies across three major guidelines

Abstract Given the scale and cost of the low back pain problem, it is imperative that healthcare professionals involved in the care of people with low back pain have access to up-to-date, evidence-based information to assist them in treatment decision-making. Clinical guidelines exist to promote the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology 2016-12, Vol.30 (6), p.968-980
Hauptverfasser: O'Connell, Neil E., PhD, MSc, Cook, Chad E., PhD, PT, Wand, Benedict M., BAppSc, GradDip, MAppSc, PhD, Ward, Stephen P., MBBS FRCA FFPMRCA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Given the scale and cost of the low back pain problem, it is imperative that healthcare professionals involved in the care of people with low back pain have access to up-to-date, evidence-based information to assist them in treatment decision-making. Clinical guidelines exist to promote the consistent best practice, to reduce unwarranted variation and to reduce the use of low-value interventions in patient care. Recent decades have witnessed the publication of a number of such guidelines. In this narrative review, we consider three selected international interdisciplinary guidelines for the management of low back pain. Guideline development methods, consistent recommendations and inconsistencies between these guidelines are critically discussed.
ISSN:1521-6942
1532-1770
DOI:10.1016/j.berh.2017.05.001