Evaluation of stone size before flexible ureteroscopy: Which measurement is best?

To retrospectively assess the clinical utility in ureteroscopy (URS) planning of radiological parameters as predictor of stone-free status after a single flexible ureteroscopy. Sixty-seven patients with renal stones treated by flexible URS were retrospectively evaluated. To assess the clinical utili...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Progrès en urologie (Paris) 2018-01, Vol.28 (1), p.62-70
Hauptverfasser: Diamand, R, Idrissi-Kaitouni, M, Coppens, E, Roumeguère, T, Legrand, F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:fre
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To retrospectively assess the clinical utility in ureteroscopy (URS) planning of radiological parameters as predictor of stone-free status after a single flexible ureteroscopy. Sixty-seven patients with renal stones treated by flexible URS were retrospectively evaluated. To assess the clinical utility of radiological parameters, relationships between stone-free (SF) status and stone burden (maximal diameter, calculated area, calculated volume, cumulative diameter, and tridimentionnal volume [V3D]) were analyzed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve and logistic regression. Maximal diameter (AUC=0.75), calculated area (AUC 0.79), calculated volume (AUC=0.79), cumulative diameter (AUC=0.80) and tridimensional volume (AUC=0.82) revealed ability to predict SF status after URS. Stone burden evaluation is critical in predicting SF status after a single URS. Planar and volumetric measurements showed equal ability to predict SF status. V3D is more accurate but diameter measurement remains easier in clinical practice. 4.
ISSN:1166-7087
DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2017.09.014