Evaluation of stone size before flexible ureteroscopy: Which measurement is best?
To retrospectively assess the clinical utility in ureteroscopy (URS) planning of radiological parameters as predictor of stone-free status after a single flexible ureteroscopy. Sixty-seven patients with renal stones treated by flexible URS were retrospectively evaluated. To assess the clinical utili...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Progrès en urologie (Paris) 2018-01, Vol.28 (1), p.62-70 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | fre |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To retrospectively assess the clinical utility in ureteroscopy (URS) planning of radiological parameters as predictor of stone-free status after a single flexible ureteroscopy.
Sixty-seven patients with renal stones treated by flexible URS were retrospectively evaluated. To assess the clinical utility of radiological parameters, relationships between stone-free (SF) status and stone burden (maximal diameter, calculated area, calculated volume, cumulative diameter, and tridimentionnal volume [V3D]) were analyzed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve and logistic regression.
Maximal diameter (AUC=0.75), calculated area (AUC 0.79), calculated volume (AUC=0.79), cumulative diameter (AUC=0.80) and tridimensional volume (AUC=0.82) revealed ability to predict SF status after URS.
Stone burden evaluation is critical in predicting SF status after a single URS. Planar and volumetric measurements showed equal ability to predict SF status. V3D is more accurate but diameter measurement remains easier in clinical practice.
4. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1166-7087 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.purol.2017.09.014 |