Contributions of global and regional sources to mercury deposition in New York State

A global/continental atmospheric modeling system was used to obtain preliminary estimates of the contributions of major source areas to mercury deposition in New York State. A modeling system that includes a global chemical transport model (CTM) and a nested continental CTM (TEAM) was used to simula...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental pollution (1987) 2003-01, Vol.123 (3), p.365-373
Hauptverfasser: Seigneur, Christian, Lohman, Kristen, Vijayaraghavan, Krish, Shia, Run-Lie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A global/continental atmospheric modeling system was used to obtain preliminary estimates of the contributions of major source areas to mercury deposition in New York State. A modeling system that includes a global chemical transport model (CTM) and a nested continental CTM (TEAM) was used to simulate the atmospheric transport, transformations and deposition of mercury (Hg). Three scenarios were used: (1) a nominal scenario, (2) a scenario conducive to local deposition and (3) a scenario conducive to long-range transport. Deposition fluxes of Hg were analyzed at three receptor locations in New York State. For the nominal scenario, the anthropogenic emission sources (including re-emission of deposited Hg) in New York State, the rest of the contiguous United States, Asia, Europe, and Canada contributed 11–21, 25–49, 13–19, 5–7, and 2–5%, respectively to total Hg deposition at these three receptors. Natural sources contributed 16–24%. The results from the local deposition and long-range transport scenarios varied only slightly from these results. However, there are still uncertainties in our understanding of the atmospheric chemistry of Hg that are likely to affect these estimates of local, regional and global contributions. Comparison of model simulation results with data from the Mercury Deposition Network suggests that local and regional contributions may currently be overestimated.
ISSN:0269-7491
1873-6424
DOI:10.1016/S0269-7491(03)00027-7