Thyroid FNA cytology in Asian practice—Active surveillance for indeterminate thyroid nodules reduces overtreatment of thyroid carcinomas

Although Asian thyroid practices have implemented the American Thyroid Association guidelines, significant deviations in actual risk of malignancy (ROM) have been reported. With review of the literature from Asia, the authors examine the underlining reasons for actual ROMs reported in Asia being so different from western practice based on the author's perspective. Although the most popular diagnostic system for thyroid cytology used in Asian countries is the Bethesda system, the Japan Thyroid Association published clinical guidelines, including a national reporting system for thyroid cytology, to adapt conservative clinical management (active surveillance and strict triage patients for surgery) for low‐risk thyroid carcinomas. As less aggressive clinical management is favoured in Asian societies, strict triage of patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules for surgery is usually applied, which ultimately reduces overtreatment of indolent thyroid tumours. As a result, low resection rates and high ROMs for indeterminate nodules were achieved in Asian practices using the same Bethesda system. Recently, borderline thyroid tumours were introduced in the thyroid tumour classification and significant decreases in ROMs have been reported in the indeterminate categories in western practice. However, ROM of indeterminate nodules remained high in Asian practice even after borderline tumours were deemed benign. These results suggested that the diagnostic threshold of papillary thyroid carcinoma‐type nuclear features varied among practices (stricter in Asia than in western practice), and diagnostic surgery was not performed for a significant number of indeterminate nodules with benign clinical features in Asian practice, resulting in low rates of borderline tumours in surgically‐treated patients. Although Asian thyroid practices have implemented the American Thyroid Association guidelines and the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology, significant deviations in actual risk of malignancy have been reported. With review of the literature and analyses of thyroid practices in Asia, the author examines the underlining reasons why actual ROMs reported in Asia are so different from those in Western practice based on the author's perspective.