Physician, Interrupted: Workflow Interruptions and Patient Care in the Emergency Department

It is unclear how workflow interruptions impact emergency physicians at the point of care. Our study aimed to evaluate interruption characteristics experienced by academic emergency physicians. This prospective, observational study collected interruptions during attending physician shifts. An interr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of emergency medicine 2017-12, Vol.53 (6), p.798-804
Hauptverfasser: Blocker, Renaldo C., Heaton, Heather A., Forsyth, Katherine L., Hawthorne, Hunter J., El-Sherif, Nibras, Bellolio, M. Fernanda, Nestler, David M., Hellmich, Thomas R., Pasupathy, Kalyan S., Hallbeck, M. Susan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:It is unclear how workflow interruptions impact emergency physicians at the point of care. Our study aimed to evaluate interruption characteristics experienced by academic emergency physicians. This prospective, observational study collected interruptions during attending physician shifts. An interruption is defined as any break in performance of a human activity that briefly requires attention. One observer captured interruptions using a validated tablet PC-based tool that time stamped and categorized the data. Data collected included: 1) type, 2) priority of interruption to original task, and 3) physical location of the interruption. A Kruskal-Wallis H test compared interruption priority and duration. A chi-squared analysis examined the priority of interruptions in and outside of the patient rooms. A total of 2355 interruptions were identified across 210 clinical hours and 28 shifts (means = 84.1 interruptions per shift, standard deviation = 14.5; means = 11.21 interruptions per hour, standard deviation = 4.45). Physicians experienced face-to-face physician interruptions most frequently (26.0%), followed by face-to-face nurse communication (21.7%), and environment (20.8%). There was a statistically significant difference in interruption duration based on the interruption priority, χ2(2) = 643.98, p 
ISSN:0736-4679
2352-5029
DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.08.067