National Sleep Foundation’s updated sleep duration recommendations: final report
Abstract Objective To make scientifically sound and practical recommendations for daily sleep duration across the life span. Methods The National Sleep Foundation convened a multidisciplinary expert panel (“Panel”) with broad representation from leading stakeholder organizations. The Panel evaluated...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sleep health 2015-12, Vol.1 (4), p.233-243 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Objective To make scientifically sound and practical recommendations for daily sleep duration across the life span. Methods The National Sleep Foundation convened a multidisciplinary expert panel (“Panel”) with broad representation from leading stakeholder organizations. The Panel evaluated the latest scientific evidence and participated in a formal consensus and voting process. Then, the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used to formulate sleep duration recommendations. Results The Panel made sleep duration recommendations for 9 age groups. Sleep duration ranges, expressed as hours of sleep per day, were designated as recommended, may be appropriate , or not recommended . Recommended sleep durations are as follows: 14-17 hours for newborns, 12-15 hours for infants, 11-14 hours for toddlers, 10-13 hours for preschoolers, 9-11 hours for school-aged children, and 8-10 hours for teenagers. Seven to 9 hours is recommended for young adults and adults, and 7-8 hours of sleep is recommended for older adults. The self-designated basis for duration selection and critical discussions are also provided. Conclusions Consensus for sleep duration recommendations was reached for specific age groupings. Consensus using a multidisciplinary expert Panel lends robust credibility to the results. Finally, limitations and caveats of these recommendations are discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2352-7218 2352-7226 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.sleh.2015.10.004 |