Is it Safe to Prep the External Fixator In Situ During Second Stage Pilon Surgical Treatment?
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the infection rate of our protocol of prepping the external fixator in situ during definitive second stage pilon fracture open reduction internal fixation. DESIGN:Retrospective clinical investigation. SETTING:Academic Level 1 Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS:Out of 229 pati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of orthopaedic trauma 2018-03, Vol.32 (3), p.e102-e105 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the infection rate of our protocol of prepping the external fixator in situ during definitive second stage pilon fracture open reduction internal fixation.
DESIGN:Retrospective clinical investigation.
SETTING:Academic Level 1 Trauma Center.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS:Out of 229 patients with distal tibia fractures presenting to our institution from 1999-2014, 100 were treated in a two-stage fashion utilizing this protocol.
INTERVENTION:Prepping the external fixator into the surgical field during the second stage/definitive open reduction internal fixation procedure.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT:The rates of deep and superficial infections after definitive fixation.
RESULTS:The deep infection rate was 13% and the superficial infection rate was 11%.
CONCLUSIONS:Infection rates using this protocol are comparable to previously reported infection rates for two-stage surgical treatment of pilon fractures. This protocol provides the treating surgeon information about an alternative method to streamline definitive fixation.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level IV. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0890-5339 1531-2291 |
DOI: | 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001050 |