Is it Safe to Prep the External Fixator In Situ During Second Stage Pilon Surgical Treatment?

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the infection rate of our protocol of prepping the external fixator in situ during definitive second stage pilon fracture open reduction internal fixation. DESIGN:Retrospective clinical investigation. SETTING:Academic Level 1 Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS:Out of 229 pati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic trauma 2018-03, Vol.32 (3), p.e102-e105
Hauptverfasser: Nielsen, Paul J, Grossman, Leonid S, Siebler, Justin C, Lyden, Elizabeth R, Reed, Lori K, Mormino, Matthew A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the infection rate of our protocol of prepping the external fixator in situ during definitive second stage pilon fracture open reduction internal fixation. DESIGN:Retrospective clinical investigation. SETTING:Academic Level 1 Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS:Out of 229 patients with distal tibia fractures presenting to our institution from 1999-2014, 100 were treated in a two-stage fashion utilizing this protocol. INTERVENTION:Prepping the external fixator into the surgical field during the second stage/definitive open reduction internal fixation procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT:The rates of deep and superficial infections after definitive fixation. RESULTS:The deep infection rate was 13% and the superficial infection rate was 11%. CONCLUSIONS:Infection rates using this protocol are comparable to previously reported infection rates for two-stage surgical treatment of pilon fractures. This protocol provides the treating surgeon information about an alternative method to streamline definitive fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level IV.
ISSN:0890-5339
1531-2291
DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000001050