The spatio‐temporal profile of multisensory integration

Task‐irrelevant visual stimuli can enhance auditory perception. However, while there is some neurophysiological evidence for mechanisms that underlie the phenomenon, the neural basis of visually induced effects on auditory perception remains unknown. Combining fMRI and EEG with psychophysical measur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The European journal of neuroscience 2020-03, Vol.51 (5), p.1210-1223
Hauptverfasser: Starke, Johanna, Ball, Felix, Heinze, Hans‐Jochen, Noesselt, Toemme
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Task‐irrelevant visual stimuli can enhance auditory perception. However, while there is some neurophysiological evidence for mechanisms that underlie the phenomenon, the neural basis of visually induced effects on auditory perception remains unknown. Combining fMRI and EEG with psychophysical measurements in two independent studies, we identified the neural underpinnings and temporal dynamics of visually induced auditory enhancement. Lower‐ and higher‐intensity sounds were paired with a non‐informative visual stimulus, while participants performed an auditory detection task. Behaviourally, visual co‐stimulation enhanced auditory sensitivity. Using fMRI, enhanced BOLD signals were observed in primary auditory cortex for low‐intensity audiovisual stimuli which scaled with subject‐specific enhancement in perceptual sensitivity. Concordantly, a modulation of event‐related potentials could already be observed over frontal electrodes at an early latency (30–80 ms), which again scaled with subject‐specific behavioural benefits. Later modulations starting around 280 ms, that is in the time range of the P3, did not fit this pattern of brain‐behaviour correspondence. Hence, the latency of the corresponding fMRI‐EEG brain‐behaviour modulation points at an early interplay of visual and auditory signals in low‐level auditory cortex, potentially mediated by crosstalk at the level of the thalamus. However, fMRI signals in primary auditory cortex, auditory thalamus and the P50 for higher‐intensity auditory stimuli were also elevated by visual co‐stimulation (in the absence of any behavioural effect) suggesting a general, intensity‐independent integration mechanism. We propose that this automatic interaction occurs at the level of the thalamus and might signify a first step of audiovisual interplay necessary for visually induced perceptual enhancement of auditory perception. We show that visually induced enhancement of auditory perception is related to enhanced fMRI signals in primary auditory cortex and auditory thalamus. Concordantly, this enhancement was also observed with EEG: even early auditory evoked potentials (P50) were elevated by vision. Most importantly, both fMRI and EEG signals scaled with subject‐specific enhancements. Together, our results suggest that audiovisual interactions occur at the level of the thalamus and might reflect automatic interplay.
ISSN:0953-816X
1460-9568
DOI:10.1111/ejn.13753