Comparison of Direct (X-Ray Diffraction and Infrared Spectrophotometry) and Indirect (Infrared Spectrophotometry) Methods for the Analysis of α-Quartz in Airborne Dusts
In this study, the α-quartz contents measured by different analytical techniques (X-ray diffraction, direct method; and infrared spectrophotometry, direct and indirect methods) were compared. The analyses were carried out on filters sampled in an industrial setting by means of a Dorr-Oliver cyclone....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Annals of occupational hygiene 2005-11, Vol.49 (8), p.661-671 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this study, the α-quartz contents measured by different analytical techniques (X-ray diffraction, direct method; and infrared spectrophotometry, direct and indirect methods) were compared. The analyses were carried out on filters sampled in an industrial setting by means of a Dorr-Oliver cyclone. To verify the methodology used, filters loaded with pure α-quartz were also analysed. By and large, the agreement between the two direct methods was close on average, but on the basis of a comparison of the individual results, considerable differences exist. In absolute value, the mean relative deviation between the two techniques was |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-4878 1475-3162 1475-3162 |
DOI: | 10.1093/annhyg/mei024 |