Comparison of Direct (X-Ray Diffraction and Infrared Spectrophotometry) and Indirect (Infrared Spectrophotometry) Methods for the Analysis of α-Quartz in Airborne Dusts

In this study, the α-quartz contents measured by different analytical techniques (X-ray diffraction, direct method; and infrared spectrophotometry, direct and indirect methods) were compared. The analyses were carried out on filters sampled in an industrial setting by means of a Dorr-Oliver cyclone....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Annals of occupational hygiene 2005-11, Vol.49 (8), p.661-671
Hauptverfasser: KAUFFER, E., MASSON, A., MOULUT, J. C., LECAQUE, T., PROTOIS, J. C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this study, the α-quartz contents measured by different analytical techniques (X-ray diffraction, direct method; and infrared spectrophotometry, direct and indirect methods) were compared. The analyses were carried out on filters sampled in an industrial setting by means of a Dorr-Oliver cyclone. To verify the methodology used, filters loaded with pure α-quartz were also analysed. By and large, the agreement between the two direct methods was close on average, but on the basis of a comparison of the individual results, considerable differences exist. In absolute value, the mean relative deviation between the two techniques was
ISSN:0003-4878
1475-3162
1475-3162
DOI:10.1093/annhyg/mei024