Early vs delayed closure of loop defunctioning ileostomy in patients undergoing distal colorectal resections: an integrated systematic review and meta‐analysis of published randomized controlled trials

Aims The objective of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes and feasibility of early loop defunctioning ileostomy closure, within 2 weeks of index surgery, in patients undergoing distal colorectal resection. Methods A systematic review of the literature on published randomized controlled trials reporting the feasibility and outcomes on early vs delayed closure of loop defunctioning ileostomy in patients undergoing distal colorectal resection using the principles of meta‐analysis on RevMan 5.4 statistical software was undertaken. Results Four randomized, controlled trials on 446 patients evaluating the feasibility and outcomes on early vs delayed closure of loop defunctioning ileostomy in patients undergoing low colorectal resection were analysed. There were 176 patients in the early closure group and 270 patients in the delayed closure group. The risk of anastomotic leak [risk ratio 0.37 (CI: 0.10–1.42), P = 0.15], anastomotic stenosis [risk ratio 4.79 (CI: 0.23–98.47), P = 0.31] and postoperative complications [risk ratio 0.75 (CI: 0.48–1.16), P = 0.19] was similar in both groups. In addition, there was no significant difference between the groups with regard to the duration of operation [standardized mean difference −0.49 (CI: −01.09, −0.12), P = 0.12] and length of hospitalization [standardized mean difference −0.04 (CI: −0.25, −0.18), P = 0.75]. Conclusions Early closure of loop defunctioning ileostomy in patients undergoing distal colorectal resection is feasible with comparable outcomes to delayed closure.