Creation and validation of a simulator for corneal rust ring removal

Abstract Purpose To create and validate a simulation model for corneal rust ring removal. Methods Rust rings were created on cadaveric eyes with the use of small particles of metal. The eyes were mounted on suction plates at slit lamps and the trainees practiced rust ring removal. An inexperienced c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of ophthalmology 2017-10, Vol.52 (5), p.447-452
Hauptverfasser: Mednick, Zale, MD, Tabanfar, Reza, BSc, Alexander, Ashley, COMT, Simpson, Sarah, MD, Baxter, Stephanie, MD, FRCSC
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Purpose To create and validate a simulation model for corneal rust ring removal. Methods Rust rings were created on cadaveric eyes with the use of small particles of metal. The eyes were mounted on suction plates at slit lamps and the trainees practiced rust ring removal. An inexperienced cohort of medical students and first year ophthalmology residents ( n =11), and an experienced cohort of senior residents and faculty ( n =11) removed the rust rings from the eyes with the use of a burr. Rust ring removal was evaluated based on removal time, percentage of rust removed and incidence of corneal perforation. A survey was administered to participants to determine face validity. Results Time for rust ring removal was longer in the inexperienced group at 187±93 seconds (range of 66-408 seconds), compared to the experienced group at 117±54 seconds (range of 55-240 seconds) ( p =0.046). Removal speed was similar between groups, at 4847±4355 pixels/minute and 7206±5181 pixels/minute in the inexperienced and experienced groups, respectively ( p =0.26). Removal percentage values were similar between groups, at 61±15% and 69±18% ( p =0.38). There were no corneal perforations. 100% (22/22) of survey respondents believed the simulator would be a valuable practice tool, and 89% (17/19) felt the simulation was a valid representation of the clinical correlate. Conclusion The corneal rust ring simulator presented here is a valid training tool that could be used by early trainees to gain greater comfort level before attempting rust ring removal on a live patient.
ISSN:0008-4182
1715-3360
DOI:10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.02.024