Quality control of regional wall motion analysis in stress Echo 2020

The trial “Stress Echo (SE) 2020” evaluates novel applications of SE beyond coronary artery disease. The aim of the study was control quality and harmonize reading criteria. One reader from 78 centers of the SE 2020 network asked for credentials to read a set of 20 SE video-clips selected by the cor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cardiology 2017-12, Vol.249, p.479-485
Hauptverfasser: Ciampi, Quirino, Picano, Eugenio, Paterni, Marco, Daros, Clarissa Borguezan, Simova, Iana, de Castro e Silva Pretto, José Luis, Scali, Maria Chiara, Gaibazzi, Nicola, Severino, Sergio, Djordjevic-Dikic, Ana, Kasprzak, Jaroslaw D., Zagatina, Angela, Varga, Albert, Lowenstein, Jorge, Merlo, Pablo Martin, Amor, Miguel, Celutkiene, Jelena, Perez, Julio E., Di Salvo, Giovanni, Galderisi, Maurizio, Mori, Fabio, Costantino, Marco Fabio, Massa, Laura, Dekleva, Milica, Chaves, Daniel Quesada, Trambaiolo, Paolo, Citro, Rodolfo, Colonna, Paolo, Rigo, Fausto, Torres, Marco A.R., Monte, Ines, Stankovic, Ivan, Neskovic, Aleksander, Cortigiani, Lauro, Re, Federica, Dodi, Claudio, D'Andrea, Antonello, Villari, Bruno, Arystan, Ayana, De Nes, Michele, Carpeggiani, Clara
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The trial “Stress Echo (SE) 2020” evaluates novel applications of SE beyond coronary artery disease. The aim of the study was control quality and harmonize reading criteria. One reader from 78 centers of the SE 2020 network asked for credentials to read a set of 20 SE video-clips selected by the core lab. All aspiring centers met the pre-requisite of high-volume and the years of experience in SE ranged from 5 to 31years (mean value 18years). The diagnostic gold standard was a reading by the core lab. The a priori determined pass threshold was 18/20 (≥90%). Of the initial 78 who started, 57 completed the first attempt: individual readers' score on first attempt ranged from 07/20 to 20/20 (accuracy from 35% to 100%, mean 78.7±13%) and 44 readers passed it. There was a very poor correlation between years of experience and the reader's score on first attempt (r=−0.161, p=0.231). Of the 13 readers who failed the first attempt, 12 took it again after the web-based session and their accuracy improved (74% vs. 96%, p
ISSN:0167-5273
1874-1754
DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.172