Single‐center experience in urgent lung transplantation program in a country with a shortage of donors: Does the end justify the means?

In rapidly deteriorating patients awaiting lung transplantation (LT), supportive strategies are only temporary and urgent lung transplant (ULT) remains the last option. The few publications on this topic report conflicting results. According to the Italian national program, patients on mechanical ve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical transplantation 2017-12, Vol.31 (12), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Schiavon, Marco, Faggi, Giulio, Di Gregorio, Guido, Calabrese, Francesca, Lunardi, Francesca, Marulli, Giuseppe, Feltracco, Paolo, Loy, Monica, Damin, Marco, Cozzi, Emanuele, Gregori, Dario, Calabrese, Fiorella, Rea, Federico
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In rapidly deteriorating patients awaiting lung transplantation (LT), supportive strategies are only temporary and urgent lung transplant (ULT) remains the last option. The few publications on this topic report conflicting results. According to the Italian national program, patients on mechanical ventilation and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may be included in urgent list. We reviewed our experience from January 2012 to December 2014 with ULT and elective lung transplantation (ELT), focusing on outcomes. In the study period, 16 patients received ULT, while 51 received ELT. Among ULT, 1 patient (5.8%) died in waiting list (WL) while 16 patients underwent LT with a median WL time of 6 days. ELT WL mortality was 13.5%, and median WL time 368 days. In‐hospital mortality was lower in ELT group (5.8% vs 37.5%, P 
ISSN:0902-0063
1399-0012
DOI:10.1111/ctr.13129