Assessment of Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification and the Ultrasound Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in Patients With Thyroid Nodules Referred for Biopsy

Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic performance of Virtual Touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ; Siemens Medical Solutions, Mountain View, CA) in combination with the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI‐RADS) for assessing thyroid nodules referred for biopsy. Methods A total of 197...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2018-03, Vol.37 (3), p.725-736
Hauptverfasser: Mao, Feng, Xu, Hui‐Xiong, Zhou, Hang, Bo, Xiao‐Wan, Li, Xiao‐Long, Li, Dan‐Dan, Liu, Bo‐Ji, Zhang, Yi‐Feng, Xu, Jun‐Mei, Qu, Shen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic performance of Virtual Touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ; Siemens Medical Solutions, Mountain View, CA) in combination with the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI‐RADS) for assessing thyroid nodules referred for biopsy. Methods A total of 197 surgically or cytologically proven thyroid nodules in 187 patients were included. Nodules evaluated by conventional ultrasound (US) and VTIQ examinations were classified into US TI‐RADS categories. The shear wave velocity (SWV) on VTIQ was assessed, and the cutoff value was obtained from a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Diagnostic performances of conventional US, VTIQ, and their combination were compared. Results There were 134 benign and 63 malignant nodules. The sensitivity and specificity for the US TI‐RADS were 98.4% and 20.1%, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the mean, maximum, minimum, and ratio of the SWV were 0.818, 0.805, 0.799, and 0.728. With a cutoff value of 2.90 m/s, the sensitivity and specificity of the mean SWV were 71.4% and 82.8%. By applying this value or less as a standard for downgrading TI‐RADS category 4a to category 3 lesions, the specificity significantly rose from 20.1% to 47.0% (P 
ISSN:0278-4297
1550-9613
DOI:10.1002/jum.14413