Risk-adjusted regional outcomes in elective medicare colorectal surgery

Regional differences in utilization of services in healthcare are commonly understood, but risk-adjusted evaluation of outcomes has not been done. Risk-adjusted adverse outcomes (AOs) for elective Medicare colorectal resections were studied for 2012–2014. Risk-adjusted metrics were inpatient deaths, prolonged postoperative length-of-stay, 90-day post-discharge deaths, and 90-day relevant post-discharge readmissions. The nine Census Bureau regions of the U.S. were evaluated by using standard deviations of predicted adverse outcomes to evaluate observed versus expected events. Overall AO rate was 24.3% from 86,624 patients in 1497 hospitals. Region 9 (Pacific) had the best outcomes (z-score = −3.06; risk-adjusted AO rate = 22.9%) and Region 1 (New England) the poorest (z-score = +1.86; risk-adjusted AO rate = 25.4%). A 4.9 SD difference exists among the best and poorest performing regions in risk-adjusted colorectal surgery outcomes. Alternative Payment Models should consider regional benchmarks as a variable for the evaluation of quality and pricing of episodes of care. •This manuscript review of elective colorectal resections that are evaluated by hospital and by region of the country.•The results identify differences among hospital performances and modest differences are seen between regions of the country.•Hospital and regional differences will have significance as alternative payment models are being advanced.