Preparatory cortical and spinal settings to counteract anticipated and non-anticipated perturbations
•Changes in H-reflexes between anticipatory conditions imply that spinal-level preparatory setting is perturbation-specific.•SICI was reduced before perturbations compared to static standing.•The cortically mediated LLR in anticipated perturbations was different to the LLR in non-anticipated perturb...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neuroscience 2017-12, Vol.365, p.12-22 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Changes in H-reflexes between anticipatory conditions imply that spinal-level preparatory setting is perturbation-specific.•SICI was reduced before perturbations compared to static standing.•The cortically mediated LLR in anticipated perturbations was different to the LLR in non-anticipated perturbations.
Little is known about how the central nervous system prepares postural responses differently in anticipated compared to non-anticipated perturbations. To investigate this, participants were exposed to translational and rotational perturbations presented in a blocked (anticipated) and a random (non-anticipated) design. The preparatory setting (‘central set’) was measured by H-reflexes, motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) shortly before perturbation onset in the soleus of 15 healthy adults. Additionally, the behavioral consequences of differential preparatory settings were analyzed by comparing the short- (SLR), medium- (MLR), and long-latency response (LLR) of the soleus after anticipated and non-anticipated rotations and translations. H-reflexes elicited before perturbation were different between conditions (p=0.023) with larger amplitudes in anticipated translations compared to anticipated rotations (37.0%; p=0.048). Reduced SICI was found in the three conditions containing perturbations compared to static standing (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0306-4522 1873-7544 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.09.032 |