Inpatient Treatment of Patients Admitted for Dizziness: A Population-Based Healthcare Research Study on Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome

OBJECTIVE:To determine inpatient treatment rates of patients with dizziness with focus on diagnostics, treatment and outcome. STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective population-based study. SETTING:Inpatients in the federal state Thuringia in 2014. PATIENTS:All 1,262 inpatients (62% females, median age61 yr) tre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Otology & neurotology 2017-12, Vol.38 (10), p.e460-e469
Hauptverfasser: Renner, Vera, Geißler, Katharina, Boeger, Daniel, Buentzel, Jens, Esser, Dirk, Hoffmann, Kerstin, Jecker, Peter, Mueller, Andreas, Radtke, Gerald, Axer, Hubertus, Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVE:To determine inpatient treatment rates of patients with dizziness with focus on diagnostics, treatment and outcome. STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective population-based study. SETTING:Inpatients in the federal state Thuringia in 2014. PATIENTS:All 1,262 inpatients (62% females, median age61 yr) treated for inpatient dizziness were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:The association between analyzed parameters and probability of improvement and recovery was tested using univariable and multivariable statistics. RESULTS:Final diagnosis at demission was peripheral vestibular disorder (PVD), central vestibular disorder (CVD), cardiovascular syndrome, somatoform syndrome, and unclassified disease in 75, 9, 3, 0.6, and 13%, respectively. The most frequent diseases were acute vestibular neuritis (28%) and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (22%). The follow-up time was 38 ± 98 days. 88.5% of patients showed at least an improvement of complaints and 31.4% a complete recovery. The probability for no improvement from inpatient dizziness was higher if the patient had a history of ear/vestibular disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.506; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.301–1.742), and was taking more than two drugs for comorbidity (HR = 1.163; CI = 1.032–1.310). Compared with final diagnosis of cardiovascular syndrome, patients with PVD (HR = 1.715; CI = 1.219–2.415) and CVD (HR = 1.587; CI = 1.076–2.341) had a worse outcome. CONCLUSIONS:Inpatient treatment of dizziness was highly variable in daily practice. The population-based recovery rate was worse than reported in clinical trials. We need better ways to implement clinical trial findings for inpatients with dizziness.
ISSN:1531-7129
1537-4505
DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001568