Platform model describing pharmacokinetic properties of vc-MMAE antibody–drug conjugates

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) developed using the valine-citrulline-MMAE (vc-MMAE) platform, consist of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) covalently bound with a potent anti-mitotic toxin (MMAE) through a protease-labile vc linker. Recently, clinical data for a variety of vc-MMAE ADCs has become availab...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics 2017-12, Vol.44 (6), p.537-548
Hauptverfasser: Kågedal, Matts, Gibiansky, Leonid, Xu, Jian, Wang, Xin, Samineni, Divya, Chen, Shang-Chiung, Lu, Dan, Agarwal, Priya, Wang, Bei, Saad, Ola, Koppada, Neelima, Fine, Bernard M., Jin, Jin Y., Girish, Sandhya, Li, Chunze
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) developed using the valine-citrulline-MMAE (vc-MMAE) platform, consist of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) covalently bound with a potent anti-mitotic toxin (MMAE) through a protease-labile vc linker. Recently, clinical data for a variety of vc-MMAE ADCs has become available. The goal of this analysis was to develop a platform model that simultaneously described antibody-conjugated MMAE (acMMAE) pharmacokinetic (PK) data from eight vc-MMAE ADCs, against different targets and tumor indications; and to assess differences and similarities of model parameters and model predictions, between different compounds. Clinical PK data of eight vc-MMAE ADCs from eight Phase I studies were pooled. A population PK platform model for the eight ADCs was developed, where the inter-compound variability (ICV) was described explicitly, using the third random effect level (ICV), and implemented using LEVEL option of NONMEM 7.3. The PK was described by a two-compartment model with time dependent clearance. Clearance and volume of distribution increased with body weight; volume was higher for males, and clearance mildly decreased with the nominal dose. Michaelis–Menten elimination had only minor effect on PK and was not included in the model. Time-dependence of clearance had no effect beyond the first dosing cycle. Clearance and central volume were similar among ADCs, with ICV of 15 and 5%, respectively. Thus, PK of acMMAE was largely comparable across different vc-MMAE ADCs. The model may be applied to predict PK-profiles of vc-MMAE ADCs under development, estimate individual exposure for the subsequent PK–pharmacodynamics (PD) analysis, and project optimal dose regimens and PK sampling times.
ISSN:1567-567X
1573-8744
DOI:10.1007/s10928-017-9544-y