Comparison of anatomic and non‐anatomic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

Background The aim of the present study was to compare the prognostic impact of anatomic resection (AR) versus non‐anatomic resection (NAR) on patient survival after resection of a single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods To control for confounding variable distributions, a 1‐to‐1 propensity s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences 2017-11, Vol.24 (11), p.616-626
Hauptverfasser:	Kaibori, Masaki, Kon, Masanori, Kitawaki, Tomoki, Kawaura, Takayuki, Hasegawa, Kiyoshi, Kokudo, Norihiro, Ariizumi, Shunichi, Beppu, Toru, Ishizu, Hiroyuki, Kubo, Shoji, Kamiyama, Toshiya, Takamura, Hiroyuki, Kobayashi, Tsuyoshi, Kim, Dong‐Sik, Wang, Hee Jung, Kim, Jong Man, Han, Dai Hoon, Park, Sang‐Jae, Kang, Koo Jeong, Hwang, Shin, Roh, Younghoon, You, Young Kyung, Joh, Jae‐Won, Yamamoto, Masakazu
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adult Aged Anatomic resection Biopsy, Needle Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery Cohort Studies Databases, Factual Disease-Free Survival Female Hepatectomy - methods Hepatectomy - mortality Hepatocellular carcinoma Humans Immunohistochemistry Japan Liver - anatomy & histology Liver - surgery Liver cancer Liver Neoplasms - mortality Liver Neoplasms - pathology Liver Neoplasms - surgery Male Middle Aged Non‐anatomic resection Overall survival Prognosis Propensity Score Proportional Hazards Models Republic of Korea Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment Survival Analysis Treatment Outcome
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Background The aim of the present study was to compare the prognostic impact of anatomic resection (AR) versus non‐anatomic resection (NAR) on patient survival after resection of a single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods To control for confounding variable distributions, a 1‐to‐1 propensity score match was applied to compare the outcomes of AR and NAR. Among 710 patients with a primary, solitary HCC of
ISSN:	1868-6974 1868-6982
DOI:	10.1002/jhbp.502