Coronary artery assessment using self-navigated free-breathing radial whole-heart magnetic resonance angiography in patients with congenital heart disease

Objectives To evaluate a self-navigated free-breathing three-dimensional (SNFB3D) radial whole-heart MRA technique for assessment of main coronary arteries (CAs) and side branches in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). Methods SNFB3D-MRA datasets of 109 patients (20.1±11.8 years) were incl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2018-03, Vol.28 (3), p.1267-1275
Hauptverfasser: Albrecht, Moritz H., Varga-Szemes, Akos, Schoepf, U. Joseph, Apfaltrer, Georg, Xu, Jiaqian, Jin, Kwang-Nam, Hlavacek, Anthony M., Chowdhury, Shahryar M., Suranyi, Pal, Tesche, Christian, De Cecco, Carlo N., Piccini, Davide, Stuber, Matthias, Ginami, Giulia, Vogl, Thomas J., Nutting, Arni
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To evaluate a self-navigated free-breathing three-dimensional (SNFB3D) radial whole-heart MRA technique for assessment of main coronary arteries (CAs) and side branches in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). Methods SNFB3D-MRA datasets of 109 patients (20.1±11.8 years) were included. Three readers assessed the depiction of CA segments, diagnostic confidence in determining CA dominance, overall image quality and the ability to freeze cardiac and respiratory motion. Vessel sharpness was quantitatively measured. Results The percentages of cases with excellent CA depiction were as follows (mean score): left main, 92.6 % (1.92); left anterior descending (LAD), 88.3 % (1.88); right (RCA), 87.8 % (1.85); left circumflex, 82.8 % (1.82); posterior descending, 50.2 % (1.50) and first diagonal, 39.8 % (1.39). High diagnostic confidence for the assessment of CA dominance was achieved in 56.2 % of MRA examinations (mean score, 1.56). Cardiac motion freezing (mean score, 2.18; Pearson’s r =0.73, P
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-017-5035-1