Veterinary research in clinical practice

While randomisation is an ideal for good statistical analysis of the outcomes being evaluated, in veterinary surgery randomisation is almost always not applicable to clinical research because subjecting patients to novel treatments where previous treatments have become established and accepted would...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary record 2017-09, Vol.181 (10), p.271-271
1. Verfasser: Manning, Paul R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:While randomisation is an ideal for good statistical analysis of the outcomes being evaluated, in veterinary surgery randomisation is almost always not applicable to clinical research because subjecting patients to novel treatments where previous treatments have become established and accepted would be considered experimentation. Often in surgical research the research method is necessarily suboptimal from a statistical point of view, but optimal from a surgical development point of view, in which the various aspects of bias are brought into sharp focus to achieve a rigorous conclusion. Raw evidence gathered can be of various levels of quality, but we should not denigrate this raw data for the reason it is 'lower quality evidence' on the basis that it fails to meet the quality assurance measures, because it is a critically important part of the whole research process and effort.
ISSN:0042-4900
2042-7670
DOI:10.1136/vr.j4132