Validation Testing Demonstrates Efficacy of a 7-Day Fluid Record to Estimate Daily Water Intake in Adult Men and Women When Compared with Total Body Water Turnover Measurement
Mean daily water intake from fluids (WATER-FL) has proven to be difficult to measure because of a range of nonvalidated data collection techniques. Few questionnaires have been validated to estimate WATER-FL against self-reported diaries or urinary hydration markers, which may limit their objectivit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of nutrition 2017-10, Vol.147 (10), p.2001-2007 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Mean daily water intake from fluids (WATER-FL) has proven to be difficult to measure because of a range of nonvalidated data collection techniques. Few questionnaires have been validated to estimate WATER-FL against self-reported diaries or urinary hydration markers, which may limit their objectivity.
The goals of this investigation were
) to assess the validity of a 7-d fluid record (7dFLR) to measure WATER-FL (WATER-FL-7dFLR) through comparison with WATER-FL as calculated by measuring deuterium oxide (D
O) disappearance (WATER-FL-D
O), and
) to evaluate the reliability of the 7dFLR in measuring WATER-FL.
Participants [
= 96; 51% female; mean ± SD age: 41 ± 14 y; mean ± SD body mass index (in kg/m
): 26.2 ± 5.1] completed body water turnover analysis over 3 consecutive weeks. They completed the 7dFLR and food diaries during weeks 2 and 4 of the observation. The records were entered into nutritional software to determine the water content of all foods and fluids consumed. WATER-FL-D
O was calculated from water turnover (via the D
O dilution method), minus water from food and metabolic water. The agreement between the 2 methods of determining WATER-FL were compared according to a Bland-Altman plot at week 2. The test-retest reliability of 7dFLR between weeks 2 and 4 was assessed via intraclass correlation (ICC).
The mean ± SD difference between WATER-FL-7dFLR and WATER-FL-D
O was -131 ± 845 mL/d. In addition, no bias was observed (
= 0.484;
= 0.006;
= 0.488). When comparing WATER-FL-7dFLR from weeks 2 and 4, no significant difference (mean ± SD difference: 71 ± 75 mL/d;
= 0.954;
= 0.343) and an ICC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77, 0.90) was observed.
The main findings of this study were that the use of the 7dFLR is an effective and reliable method to estimate WATER-FL in adults. This style of questionnaire may be extremely helpful for collecting water intake data for large-scale epidemiologic studies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3166 1541-6100 |
DOI: | 10.3945/jn.117.253377 |