Exploiting Overlapping Advantages of In Vitro and In Cellulo Selection Systems to Isolate a Novel High-Affinity cJun Antagonist

We have combined two peptide library-screening systems, exploiting the benefits offered by both to select novel antagonistic agents of cJun. CIS display is an in vitro cell-free system that allows very large libraries (≤1014) to be interrogated. However, affinity-based screening conditions can poorl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ACS chemical biology 2017-10, Vol.12 (10), p.2579-2588
Hauptverfasser: Baxter, Daniel, Ullman, Christopher G, Frigotto, Laura, Mason, Jody M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We have combined two peptide library-screening systems, exploiting the benefits offered by both to select novel antagonistic agents of cJun. CIS display is an in vitro cell-free system that allows very large libraries (≤1014) to be interrogated. However, affinity-based screening conditions can poorly reflect those relevant to therapeutic application, particularly for difficult intracellular targets, and can lead to false positives. In contrast, an in cellulo screening system such as the Protein-fragment Complementation Assay (PCA) selects peptides with high target affinity while additionally profiling for target specificity, protease resistance, solubility, and lack of toxicity in a more relevant context. A disadvantage is the necessity to transform cells, limiting library sizes that can be screened to ≤106. However, by combining both cell-free and cell-based systems, we isolated a peptide (CPW) from a ∼1010 member library, which forms a highly stable interaction with cJun (T m = 63 °C, K d = 750 nM, ΔG = −8.2 kcal/mol) using the oncogenic transcriptional regulator Activator Protein-1 (AP-1) as our exemplar target. In contrast, CIS display alone selected a peptide with low affinity for cJun (T m = 34 °C, K d = 25 μM, ΔG = −6.2 kcal/mol), highlighting the benefit of CIS → PCA. Furthermore, increased library size with CIS → PCA vs PCA alone allows the freedom to introduce noncanonical options, such as interfacial aromatics, and solvent exposed options that may allow the molecule to explore alternative structures and interact with greater affinity and efficacy with the target. CIS → PCA therefore offers significant potential as a peptide-library screening platform by synergistically combining the relative attributes of both assays to generate therapeutically interesting compounds that may otherwise not be identified.
ISSN:1554-8929
1554-8937
DOI:10.1021/acschembio.7b00693