Techniques Used to Create Continent Catheterizable Channels: A Comparison of Long-term Results in Children
To compare long-term results of 3 different techniques used to create continent catheterizable channels (CCCs) in children in a single institution. Data were retrospectively collected from 112 children who had a CCC (appendicovesicostomy [APV], tubularized bladder flap [TBF] or Monti) created betwee...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2017-12, Vol.110, p.192-195 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To compare long-term results of 3 different techniques used to create continent catheterizable channels (CCCs) in children in a single institution.
Data were retrospectively collected from 112 children who had a CCC (appendicovesicostomy [APV], tubularized bladder flap [TBF] or Monti) created between December 1995 and December 2013. Primary outcome was revision-free survival. Secondary outcomes were channel stenosis, incontinence, and false channel requiring revision. Time-to-event survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier survival curve.
A total of 117 CCCs were identified with median follow-up of 85 months. Surgical revision was required in 52%, with no significant difference between the different techniques. Major revision was required in 27% of the cases and significantly more often in Monti channels. Complete revision was required in 7%. Stenosis requiring revision was seen in 33%. A false channel was formed in 9% of the cases. Incontinence with a low leak point pressure was seen in 12%. A time-to-event analysis with a Kaplan-Meier curve showed no significant differences between the 3 techniques.
Although CCC is an effective solution for children who cannot perform urethral catheterization, 52% requires surgical revision. Because no differences were found in outcome between APV, TBF, and Monti, we conclude that a TBF CCC is a good alternative for the APV. If the appendix is not available and bladder volume is sufficient, a TBF channel is preferred to a Monti channel. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0090-4295 1527-9995 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.urology.2017.08.030 |