Venous Complications in One Versus Two Vein Anastomoses in Head and Neck Free Flaps

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare rates of reexploration and flap failure in patients with 1- and 2-vein anastomoses in free flap reconstructions. Methods: Retrospective chart review of 300 patients undergoing free flap reconstruction to head and neck defects from 2010 to 2014. Res...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology rhinology & laryngology, 2017-10, Vol.126 (10), p.722-726
Hauptverfasser: Khaja, Sobia F., Rubin, Nathan, Bayon, Rodrigo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare rates of reexploration and flap failure in patients with 1- and 2-vein anastomoses in free flap reconstructions. Methods: Retrospective chart review of 300 patients undergoing free flap reconstruction to head and neck defects from 2010 to 2014. Results: One venous anastomosis was performed in 229 patients, and 2 venous anastomoses were performed in 71 patients. The 1-vein group had significantly more reexplorations in the operating room (36/229, 15.7%) compared with the 2-vein group (4/71, 5.6%; P = .028), even when controlling for flap type (P = .022). This finding remained true among radial forearm flaps (17/81, 21% vs 3/53, 5.7%; P = .024). The number of venous anastomoses was not significantly associated with flap failure, though patients with flap failure did have a significantly greater proportion of venous issues (P < .001). Conclusions: Two-vein anastomoses do not appear to reduce rates of flap failure or postoperative venous thrombosis but are associated with a lower number of reexplorations in the operating room even after accounting for differences in flap types and surgeons.
ISSN:0003-4894
1943-572X
DOI:10.1177/0003489417728089