The Productive Ward Program: A Two-Year Implementation Impact Review Using a Longitudinal Multilevel Study
Aim To investigate the impact of the quality improvement program “Productive Ward – Releasing Time to Care™” using nurses’ and midwives’ reports of practice environment, burnout, quality of care, job outcomes, as well as workload, decision latitude, social capital, and engagement. Background Despite...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of nursing research 2017-03, Vol.49 (1), p.28-38 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aim
To investigate the impact of the quality improvement program “Productive Ward – Releasing Time to Care™” using nurses’ and midwives’ reports of practice environment, burnout, quality of care, job outcomes, as well as workload, decision latitude, social capital, and engagement.
Background
Despite the requirement for health systems to improve quality and the proliferation of quality improvement programs designed for healthcare, the empirical evidence supporting large-scale quality improvement programs impacting patient satisfaction, staff engagement, and quality care remains sparse.
Method
A longitudinal study was performed in a large 600-bed acute care university hospital at two measurement intervals for nurse practice environment, burnout, and quality of care and job outcomes and three measurement intervals for workload, decision latitude, social capital, and engagement between June 2011 and November 2014.
Results
Positive results were identified in practice environment, decision latitude, and social capital. Less favorable results were identified in relation to perceived workload, emotional exhaustion. and vigor. Moreover, measures of quality of care and job satisfaction were reported less favorably.
Conclusion
This study highlights the need to further understand how to implement large-scale quality improvement programs so that they integrate with daily practices and promote “quality improvement” as “business as usual.” |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0844-5621 1705-7051 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0844562116686491 |