Factors associated with second‐line triplet therapy in routine care in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
Summary What is known and objective Second‐line therapy (SLT) trials in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) report superior outcomes with triplet combinations. We sought to determine factors associated with triplet SLT in routine practice. Methods A retrospective cohort with claims for MM be...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics 2018-02, Vol.43 (1), p.45-51 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Summary
What is known and objective
Second‐line therapy (SLT) trials in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) report superior outcomes with triplet combinations. We sought to determine factors associated with triplet SLT in routine practice.
Methods
A retrospective cohort with claims for MM between 01/01/2008 and 03/31/2015 was grouped by 1‐2 (“doublet”) or 3+ (“triplet”) agent therapy. Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and disability status; CRAB symptoms (hypercalcaemia, renal/bone disease, anaemia); and relapse risk were determined.
Results
Among 623 patients, the triplet group (n=146 [23%]) was younger (65.2 vs 69.8 years) and more likely to have high‐risk relapse (67% vs 50%), CRAB symptoms (94.5% vs 81.1%), triplet first‐line treatment (75% vs 51%) and frontline stem cell transplant (38% vs 20%) (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0269-4727 1365-2710 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jcpt.12606 |