Factors associated with second‐line triplet therapy in routine care in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Summary What is known and objective Second‐line therapy (SLT) trials in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) report superior outcomes with triplet combinations. We sought to determine factors associated with triplet SLT in routine practice. Methods A retrospective cohort with claims for MM be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics 2018-02, Vol.43 (1), p.45-51
Hauptverfasser: Hari, P., Romanus, D., Henk, H. J., Becker, L. K., Noga, S. J., Morrison, V. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary What is known and objective Second‐line therapy (SLT) trials in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) report superior outcomes with triplet combinations. We sought to determine factors associated with triplet SLT in routine practice. Methods A retrospective cohort with claims for MM between 01/01/2008 and 03/31/2015 was grouped by 1‐2 (“doublet”) or 3+ (“triplet”) agent therapy. Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and disability status; CRAB symptoms (hypercalcaemia, renal/bone disease, anaemia); and relapse risk were determined. Results Among 623 patients, the triplet group (n=146 [23%]) was younger (65.2 vs 69.8 years) and more likely to have high‐risk relapse (67% vs 50%), CRAB symptoms (94.5% vs 81.1%), triplet first‐line treatment (75% vs 51%) and frontline stem cell transplant (38% vs 20%) (P
ISSN:0269-4727
1365-2710
DOI:10.1111/jcpt.12606