Clinical efficacies of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using suture anchor versus hook plate in the treatment of distal clavicle fracture

Comparison of clinical efficacies between coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using autologous gracilis tendon with suture anchor and clavicular hook plate for the treatment of acute Neer type II distal clavicle fracture. Both coracoclavicular reconstruction with autologous gracilis tendon and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research surgery & research, 2017-12, Vol.103 (8), p.1287-1293
Hauptverfasser: Yan, H.W., Li, L., Wang, R.C., Yang, Y., Xie, Y., Tang, J., Shi, Z.Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Comparison of clinical efficacies between coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using autologous gracilis tendon with suture anchor and clavicular hook plate for the treatment of acute Neer type II distal clavicle fracture. Both coracoclavicular reconstruction with autologous gracilis tendon and clavicular hook plate could achieve satisfactory results for treating acute Neer type II distal clavicle fracture. Acute Neer type II distal clavicle fracture patients enrolled in this prospective randomized study were divided into the coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction group (using autologous gracilis tendon and suture anchor) and the hook plate group. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by shoulder X-ray, forward flexion, abduction and external rotation angle, Constant–Murley shoulder score and pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at each follow-up for up to 24 months. The current study enrolled a total of 42 acute Neer type II distal clavicle fracture patients attended our hospital from March 2010 to December 2013. All patients had achieved complete healing and followed up for an average of 26 months (range, 24–38 months). At 3-month and 6-month follow-ups, Constant–Murley score in the ligament reconstruction group was significantly higher (93.8±2.6 vs. 88.7±8.7; 95.9±2.7 vs. 93.0±7.0, P
ISSN:1877-0568
1877-0568
DOI:10.1016/j.otsr.2017.07.006