A survey of honor‐related practices among US obstetricians and gynecologists
Objective To assess patterns of honor‐related practices—including virginity testing, virginity restoration, and female genital mutilation (FGM)—among US obstetrician–gynecologists (OBGYNs). Methods Between June 1 and August 31, 2016, 1000 members of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecolo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2017-11, Vol.139 (2), p.164-169 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
To assess patterns of honor‐related practices—including virginity testing, virginity restoration, and female genital mutilation (FGM)—among US obstetrician–gynecologists (OBGYNs).
Methods
Between June 1 and August 31, 2016, 1000 members of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists were invited by email to complete an anonymous online survey. The survey comprised 42 questions evaluating the demographic and practice characteristics of the respondents.
Results
Overall, 288 of the 909 practicing US OBGYNs with functioning email addresses completed the survey (31.7% response rate). In the 12 months before the survey, 168 (58.3%) respondents had provided care to one or more patients who had previously undergone FGM. Care was also provided for patients who requested virginity testing or virginity restoration by 29 (10.1%) and 16 (5.6%) respondents, respectively. Ten (3.5%) respondents performed virginity testing on request, whereas 3 (1.0%) performed virginity restoration.
Conclusion
Some respondents performed honor‐related practices, which indicated a need to educate all practicing US OBGYNs about their ethical and legal obligations in the care of such patients.
The number of US patients who either request or are subjected to honor‐related practices, particularly female genital mutilation, could be greater than previously believed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-7292 1879-3479 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ijgo.12294 |