Does Ultrasound‐Enhanced Instruction of Musculoskeletal Anatomy Improve Physical Examination Skills of First‐Year Medical Students?

Objectives Ultrasound imaging is commonly used to teach basic anatomy to medical students. The purpose of this study was to determine whether learning musculoskeletal anatomy with ultrasound improved performance on medical students' musculoskeletal physical examination skills. Methods Twenty‐se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2018-01, Vol.37 (1), p.225-232
Hauptverfasser: Walrod, Bryant J., Schroeder, Allison, Conroy, Mark J., Boucher, Laura C., Bockbrader, Marcia, Way, David P., McCamey, Kendra L., Hartz, Clinton A., Jonesco, Michael A., Bahner, David P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives Ultrasound imaging is commonly used to teach basic anatomy to medical students. The purpose of this study was to determine whether learning musculoskeletal anatomy with ultrasound improved performance on medical students' musculoskeletal physical examination skills. Methods Twenty‐seven first‐year medical students were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 instructional groups: either shoulder or knee. Both groups received a lecture followed by hands‐on ultrasound scanning on live human models of the assigned joint. After instruction, students were assessed on their ability to accurately palpate 4 anatomic landmarks: the acromioclavicular joint, the proximal long‐head biceps tendon, and the medial and lateral joint lines of the knee. Performance scores were based on both accuracy and time. A total physical examination performance score was derived for each joint. Scores for instructional groups were compared by a 2‐way analysis of variance with 1 repeated measure. Significant findings were further analyzed with post hoc tests. Results All students performed significantly better on the knee examination, irrespective of instructional group (F = 14.9; df = 1.25; P = .001). Moreover, the shoulder instruction group performed significantly better than the knee group on the overall assessment (t = –3.0; df = 25; P 
ISSN:0278-4297
1550-9613
DOI:10.1002/jum.14322