Choices between Chinese and Western medicine in Hong Kong – interactions of institutional environment, health beliefs and treatment outcomes

Abstract Background About 15–20% of the general public in Hong Kong consult TCM practitioners. This study explored the decision making process involved in Hong Kong Chinese's choice between TCM and western medicine. Methods Eight focus group interviews (six to eight participants per group) and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Complementary therapies in clinical practice 2017-08, Vol.28, p.70-74
Hauptverfasser: Sun, Kai Sing, BSc (HKUST), MA (CUHK), Cheng, Yeung Hung, MSc (Lond), PhD (CUHK), Wun, Yuk Tsan, MBBS, MPhil, MD, Lam, Tai Pong, MBBS, MFM (Monash), PhD (Sydney), MD (HK), FRACGP, FHKAM, FRCP (Glas)
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background About 15–20% of the general public in Hong Kong consult TCM practitioners. This study explored the decision making process involved in Hong Kong Chinese's choice between TCM and western medicine. Methods Eight focus group interviews (six to eight participants per group) and four individual interviews were conducted. Results The participants kept an “old fashioned” concept of TCM. Many saw TCM as a non-scientific practice and had stronger trust on the credibility of western medicine. Some participants, however, preferred the more personalized treatment approach of TCM. While western medicine was usually the initial choice, the participants were pragmatic to adopt TCM when they felt western medicine was not working, or to supplement the treatment. They were often referred by members of their social networks. Conclusion The public' perception of TCM lagged behind its actual development. Many TCM users are pragmatic users who learn through trial and error.
ISSN:1744-3881
1873-6947
DOI:10.1016/j.ctcp.2017.05.012