Use of a Robotic Seal as a Therapeutic Tool to Improve Dementia Symptoms: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
To test the effects of individual, nonfacilitated sessions with PARO (version 9), when compared against a look-alike plush toy and usual care, on the emotional and behavioral symptoms of dementia for people living in long-term care facilities. Parallel, 3-group, cluster-randomized controlled trial c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2017-09, Vol.18 (9), p.766-773 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To test the effects of individual, nonfacilitated sessions with PARO (version 9), when compared against a look-alike plush toy and usual care, on the emotional and behavioral symptoms of dementia for people living in long-term care facilities.
Parallel, 3-group, cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted between June 14, 2014, and May 16, 2015.
Twenty-eight long-term care facilities operated by 20 care organizations located in South-East Queensland, Australia.
Four hundred fifteen participants aged ≥60 years, with a documented diagnosis of dementia.
Stratified by private/not-for-profit status and randomized using a computer-generated sequence, 9 facilities were randomized to the PARO group (individual, nonfacilitated, 15-minute sessions 3 times per week for 10 weeks); 10 to plush toy (same, but given PARO with robotic features disabled); and 9 to usual care. Treatment allocation was masked to assessors.
Primary outcomes were changes in levels of engagement, mood states, and agitation after a 10-week intervention, assessed by coded video observations (baseline, weeks 1, 5, 10, and 15) and Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory–Short Form (baseline, weeks 10 and 15). Analyses followed intention-to-treat, using repeated measures mixed effects models. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12614000508673).
Video data showed that participants in the PARO group were more verbally [3.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.40–0.81, P = .011] and visually engaged (13.06, 95% CI: 17.05–9.06, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1525-8610 1538-9375 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.03.018 |