The Case for Regime-based Water Quality Standards

Conventional water quality standards have been successful in reducing the concentration of toxic substances in US waters. However, conventional standards are based on simple thresholds and are therefore poorly structured to address human-caused imbalances in dynamic, natural water quality parameters...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioscience 2004-02, Vol.54 (2), p.155-161
Hauptverfasser: POOLE, GEOFFREY C, DUNHAM, JASON B, KEENAN, DRUSCILLA M, SAUTER, SALLY T, McCULLOUGH, DALE A, MEBANE, CHRISTOPHER, LOCKWOOD, JEFFREY C, ESSIG, DON A, HICKS, MARK P, STURDEVANT, DEBRA J, MATERNA, ELIZABETH J, SPALDING, SHELLEY A, RISLEY, JOHN, DEPPMAN, MARIANNE
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Conventional water quality standards have been successful in reducing the concentration of toxic substances in US waters. However, conventional standards are based on simple thresholds and are therefore poorly structured to address human-caused imbalances in dynamic, natural water quality parameters, such as nutrients, sediment, and temperature. A more applicable type of water quality standard—a “regime standard”—would describe desirable distributions of conditions over space and time within a stream network. By mandating the protection and restoration of the aquatic ecosystem dynamics that are required to support beneficial uses in streams, well-designed regime standards would facilitate more effective strategies for management of natural water quality parameters.
ISSN:0006-3568
1525-3244
DOI:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0155:TCFRWQ]2.0.CO;2