Effectiveness of Switch to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA) Biosimilars versus Maintenance of ESA Originators in the Real-Life Setting: Matched-Control Study in Hemodialysis Patients

Background In hemodialysis (HD), switching from erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) originators to biosimilars is associated with the need for doses approximately 10% higher, according to industry-driven studies. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy on anemia control of sw...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical drug investigation 2017-10, Vol.37 (10), p.965-973
Hauptverfasser: Minutolo, Roberto, Bolasco, Piergiorgio, Chiodini, Paolo, Sposini, Stefano, Borzumati, Maurizio, Abaterusso, Cataldo, Mele, Alessandra A., Santoro, Domenico, Canale, Valeria, Santoboni, Alberto, Filiberti, Oliviero, Fiorini, Fulvio, Mura, Carlo, Imperiali, Patrizio, Borrelli, Silvio, Russo, Luigi, De Nicola, Luca, Russo, Domenico
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background In hemodialysis (HD), switching from erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) originators to biosimilars is associated with the need for doses approximately 10% higher, according to industry-driven studies. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy on anemia control of switching from ESA originators to biosimilars in daily clinical practice. Methods We retrospectively selected consecutive HD patients receiving stable intravenous ESA doses, and who had not been transfused in the previous 6 months, from 12 non-profit Italian centers. Patients switched from originators to biosimilars ( n  = 163) were matched with those maintained on ESA originators ( n  = 163) using a propensity score approach. The study duration was 24 weeks, and the primary endpoint was the mean dose difference (MDD), defined as the difference between the switch and control groups of ESA dose changes during the study (time-weighted average ESA dose minus baseline ESA dose). Results Age (70 ± 13 years), male sex (63%), diabetes (29%), history of cardiovascular disease (40%), body weight (68 ± 14 kg), vascular access (86% arteriovenous fistula), hemoglobin [Hb] (11.2 ± 0.9 g/dL) and ESA dose (8504 ± 6370 IU/week) were similar in the two groups. Hb remained unchanged during the study in both groups. Conversely, ESA dose remained unchanged in the control group and progressively increased in the switch group from week 8 to 24. The time-weighted average of the ESA dose was higher in the switch group than in the control group (10,503 ± 7389 vs. 7981 ± 5858 IU/week; p  = 0.001), leading to a significant MDD of 2423 IU/week (95% confidence interval [CI] 1615–3321), corresponding to a 39.6% (95% CI 24.7–54.6) higher dose of biosimilars compared with originators. The time-weighted average of Hb was 0.2 g/dL lower in the switch group, with a more frequent ESA hyporesponsiveness (14.7 vs. 2.5%). Iron parameters and other resistance factors remained unchanged. Conclusions In stable dialysis patients, switching from ESA originators to biosimilars requires 40% higher doses to maintain anemia control.
ISSN:1173-2563
1179-1918
DOI:10.1007/s40261-017-0562-8