Monitoring road safety development at regional level: A case study in the ASEAN region

[Display omitted] •Update the Road Safety Development Index developed by Al-Haji (2005, 2007).•Design an easy-to-reproduce monitoring model for road safety development.•Report the progress of road safety development at the ASEAN regional level.•Provide policy makers in the ASEAN region with a valuab...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Accident analysis and prevention 2017-09, Vol.106, p.437-449
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Faan, Wang, Jianjun, Wu, Jiaorong, Chen, Xiaohong, Zegras, P. Christopher
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •Update the Road Safety Development Index developed by Al-Haji (2005, 2007).•Design an easy-to-reproduce monitoring model for road safety development.•Report the progress of road safety development at the ASEAN regional level.•Provide policy makers in the ASEAN region with a valuable tool for road safety management. Persistent monitoring of progress, evaluating the results of interventions and recalibrating to achieve continuous improvement over time is widely recognized as being crucial towards the successful development of road safety. In the ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) region there is a lack of well-resourced teams that contain multidisciplinary safety professionals, and specialists in individual countries, who are able to carry out this work effectively. In this context, not only must the monitoring framework be effective, it must also be easy to use and adapt. This paper provides a case study that can be easily reproduced; based on an updated and refined Road Safety Development Index (RSDI), by means of the RSR (Rank-sum ratio)-based model, for monitoring/reporting road safety development at regional level. The case study was focused on the road safety achievements in eleven Southeast Asian countries; identifying the areas of poor performance, potential problems and delays. These countries are finally grouped into several classes based on an overview of their progress and achievements regarding to road safety. The results allow the policymakers to better understand their own road safety progress toward their desired impact; more importantly, these results enable necessary interventions to be made in a quick and timely manner. Keeping action plans on schedule if things are not progressing as desired. This would avoid ‘reinventing the wheel’ and trial and error approaches to road safety, making the implementation of action plans more effective.
ISSN:0001-4575
1879-2057
DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2017.07.016