Factors influencing property selection for conservation revolving funds
Finding sustainable ways to increase the amount of private land protected for biodiversity is challenging for many conservation organizations. In some countries, organizations use revolving-fund programs, whereby land is purchased and then sold to conservation-minded owners under condition they ente...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Conservation biology 2018-04, Vol.32 (2), p.276-286 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 286 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 276 |
container_title | Conservation biology |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Hardy, Mathew J. Fitzsimons, James A. Bekessy, Sarah A. Gordon, Ascelin |
description | Finding sustainable ways to increase the amount of private land protected for biodiversity is challenging for many conservation organizations. In some countries, organizations use revolving-fund programs, whereby land is purchased and then sold to conservation-minded owners under condition they enter into a conservation covenant or easement. The sale proceeds are used to purchase, protect, and sell additional properties, incrementally increasing the amount of protected private land. Because the effectiveness of this approach relies on selecting appropriate properties, we explored factors currently considered by practitioners and how these are integrated into decision making. We conducted exploratory, semistructured interviews with managers from each of the 5 major revolving funds in Australia. Responses indicated although conservation factors are important, financial and social factors are also highly influential. A major determinant was whether the property could be resold within a reasonable period at a price that replenishes the fund. To facilitate resale, often selected properties include the potential for the construction of a dwelling. Practitioners face with clear trade-offs between conservation, financial, amenity, and other factors in selecting properties and 3 main challenges: recovering the costs of acquisition, protection, and resale; reselling the property; and meeting conservation goals. Our findings suggest the complexity of these decisions may constrain revolvingfund effectiveness. Drawing from participant responses, we identified potential strategies to mitigate these risks such as providing adequate recreational space without jeopardizing ecological assets. We suggest managers could benefit from a shared-learning and adaptive approach to property selection given the commonalities between programs. Understanding how practitioners deal with complex decisions in the implementation of revolving funds helps identify future research to improve the performance of this conservation tool. Encontrar maneras sustentables de incrementar la cantidad depropiedad privada que proteja a la biodiversidad es un desafío para muchas organizaciones conservación. En algunos países las organizaciones utilizan programas de fondos rotatorios, en los que la tierra es comprada y vendida a propietarios con mentalidad de conservación bajo la condición de que firmen un contrato o usufructo de conservación. Los ingresos de la venta se utilizan para comprar, proteger y v |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cobi.12991 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1921126486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44973880</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44973880</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4151-24c9baaf00a36335db00bbbb68257363e1b925074ce82071039e5b3d7637d5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFLwzAUxoMobk4v3pWCFxE685K0SY463BwMdtk9tGkqHV0zk3Wy_95s3Xbw4Ls8-Pi9j4_vIXQPeAhhXrXNqyEQKeEC9SEhNAZO5SXqYyFELIQkPXTj_RJjLBNg16hHBCcpZbiPJuNMb6zzUdWUdWsaXTVf0drZtXGbXeRNbfSmsk1UWhdp23jjttlBcGZr6-2eLtum8Lfoqsxqb-6Oe4AW44_F6DOezSfT0dss1gwSiAnTMs-yEuOMppQmRY5xHiYVJOFBMZBLkmDOtBEEc8BUmiSnBU8pL5KSDtBzZxsifrfGb9Sq8trUddYY23oFkgCQlIk0oE9_0KVtXRPCKYKBp6lkVATqpaO0s947U6q1q1aZ2ynAat-u2rerDu0G-PFo2eYrU5zRU50BgA74qWqz-8dKjebv05PpQ3ez9OER5xvGJKdCYPoLHqCNoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2017669438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors influencing property selection for conservation revolving funds</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Hardy, Mathew J. ; Fitzsimons, James A. ; Bekessy, Sarah A. ; Gordon, Ascelin</creator><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Mathew J. ; Fitzsimons, James A. ; Bekessy, Sarah A. ; Gordon, Ascelin</creatorcontrib><description>Finding sustainable ways to increase the amount of private land protected for biodiversity is challenging for many conservation organizations. In some countries, organizations use revolving-fund programs, whereby land is purchased and then sold to conservation-minded owners under condition they enter into a conservation covenant or easement. The sale proceeds are used to purchase, protect, and sell additional properties, incrementally increasing the amount of protected private land. Because the effectiveness of this approach relies on selecting appropriate properties, we explored factors currently considered by practitioners and how these are integrated into decision making. We conducted exploratory, semistructured interviews with managers from each of the 5 major revolving funds in Australia. Responses indicated although conservation factors are important, financial and social factors are also highly influential. A major determinant was whether the property could be resold within a reasonable period at a price that replenishes the fund. To facilitate resale, often selected properties include the potential for the construction of a dwelling. Practitioners face with clear trade-offs between conservation, financial, amenity, and other factors in selecting properties and 3 main challenges: recovering the costs of acquisition, protection, and resale; reselling the property; and meeting conservation goals. Our findings suggest the complexity of these decisions may constrain revolvingfund effectiveness. Drawing from participant responses, we identified potential strategies to mitigate these risks such as providing adequate recreational space without jeopardizing ecological assets. We suggest managers could benefit from a shared-learning and adaptive approach to property selection given the commonalities between programs. Understanding how practitioners deal with complex decisions in the implementation of revolving funds helps identify future research to improve the performance of this conservation tool. Encontrar maneras sustentables de incrementar la cantidad depropiedad privada que proteja a la biodiversidad es un desafío para muchas organizaciones conservación. En algunos países las organizaciones utilizan programas de fondos rotatorios, en los que la tierra es comprada y vendida a propietarios con mentalidad de conservación bajo la condición de que firmen un contrato o usufructo de conservación. Los ingresos de la venta se utilizan para comprar, proteger y vender propiedades adicionales, incrementando la cantidad de propiedad privada protegida. Ya que la efectividad de esta estrategia depende de la selección de propiedades adecuadas, exploramos los factores que actualmente son considerados por los profesionales y cómo éstos están integrados en la toma de decisiones. Realizamos entrevistas exploratorias semi-estructuradas a administradores de cada uno de los cinco principales fondos rotatorios de Australia. Las respuestas indicaron que, aunque los factores de conservación son importantes, los factores sociales y económicos también son muy influyentes. Un determinante sustancial fue si la propiedad podía ser revendida dentro de un periodo razonable a un precio que reponga el financiamiento. Para facilitar la reventa, las propiedades que son seleccionadas continuamente incluyen el potencial de reconstrucción de una vivienda. Los profesionales de la conservación enfrentan compensaciones evidentes entre los factores de conservación, económicos, de amenidades y de otros tipos en la selección de propiedades y tres dificultades notorias: recuperar el costo de adquisición, protección y reventa; revender la propiedad; y cumplir con los objetivos de conservación. Nuestros resultados sugieren que la complejidad de estas decisiones puede limitar la efectividad de losfondos rotatorios. Si partimos de las respuestas de quienes participaron en las entrevistas, podemos identificar estrategias potenciales para mitigar estos riesgos, como proporcionar un espacio recreativo apropiado sin poner en riesgo los bienes ecológicos. Sugerimos que los administradores podrían beneficiarse de un aprendizaje compartido y una estrategia adaptativa para la selección de propiedades dadas las cosas en común entre los programas. Entender cómo los profesionales enfrentan las decisiones complejas en la implementación de los fondos rotatorios ayuda a identificarfuturas investigaciones para mejorar el desempeño de esta herramienta de conservación. 诸多环保组织在设法寻找可持续增加旨在保护生物多祥性的私有土地量方面面临着挑战。在ー些国家 环保组织通过循环基金项目购买土地,然后出售给有环保意识的所有者,条件是他们加入保护公约或约定地役 权。出售所得用于购买、保护以及售卖额外的地产, 以逐步増加私有保护土地的数量。由于这种方法的有效性 依赖于选择合适的地产,我们探讨了决策者目前考虑的因素, 以及这些因素是如何整合到决策中的。我们分别与 澳大利亚5 , 个主要循环基金经理进行了探索性的、半结构化的访谈。访谈显示, 然保护因素是重要的,但经济 和社会因素也有很大影响。ー个主要的决定性因素是地产能否在ー个恰当的时期内被转售用以补充循环基金。 为便于转售,经常选择那些具有建造住宅潜力的地产。决策者面临着保护、资金、便利ñ 施和其它因素之间的 权衡和三个主要困难. 回购置、保护和转售的费用;售卖地产;以及达到保护目标。我们的研究表明,这些决策 的复杂性可能会限制循环基金的有效性。从参与者的反应中,我们找到了减少这些风险的潜在策略,如在不危及 生态资产的情況下提供足够的重建空间。基于循环基金项目的共性,我们认为经理们可以从共享学习和因地制 宜的方法中获益。理解环保实践者在执行循环基金时如何进行复杂的决策,有助于确定未来的研究以改进这ー 保护工具的性能。</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12991</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28726340</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Blackwell, Inc</publisher><subject>adquisición ; Biodiversity ; Complexity ; comprador de la conservación ; Conservation ; conservation acquisition ; conservation buyer ; Conservation organizations ; conservation planning ; Conservation Practice and Policy ; contrato ; covenant ; Decision making ; Decisions ; easement ; Easements ; Funds ; Organizations ; Performance enhancement ; private land conservation ; Private property ; Privately Protected Areas ; Properties ; Properties (attributes) ; propiedad privada ; purchase-protect-resale ; Social factors ; usufructo ; Wildlife conservation ; áreas protegidas privadas ; 公约 ; 地役权 ; 环保买家 ; 私有保护地 ; 私有土地 ; 购置</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2018-04, Vol.32 (2), p.276-286</ispartof><rights>2018 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2017 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2017 Society for Conservation Biology.</rights><rights>2018, Society for Conservation Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4151-24c9baaf00a36335db00bbbb68257363e1b925074ce82071039e5b3d7637d5f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4151-24c9baaf00a36335db00bbbb68257363e1b925074ce82071039e5b3d7637d5f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0648-0346 ; 0000-0002-0503-1979 ; 0000-0003-4277-8040 ; 0000-0002-7322-7615</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44973880$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44973880$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,805,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582,58024,58257</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28726340$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Mathew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzsimons, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bekessy, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Ascelin</creatorcontrib><title>Factors influencing property selection for conservation revolving funds</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><description>Finding sustainable ways to increase the amount of private land protected for biodiversity is challenging for many conservation organizations. In some countries, organizations use revolving-fund programs, whereby land is purchased and then sold to conservation-minded owners under condition they enter into a conservation covenant or easement. The sale proceeds are used to purchase, protect, and sell additional properties, incrementally increasing the amount of protected private land. Because the effectiveness of this approach relies on selecting appropriate properties, we explored factors currently considered by practitioners and how these are integrated into decision making. We conducted exploratory, semistructured interviews with managers from each of the 5 major revolving funds in Australia. Responses indicated although conservation factors are important, financial and social factors are also highly influential. A major determinant was whether the property could be resold within a reasonable period at a price that replenishes the fund. To facilitate resale, often selected properties include the potential for the construction of a dwelling. Practitioners face with clear trade-offs between conservation, financial, amenity, and other factors in selecting properties and 3 main challenges: recovering the costs of acquisition, protection, and resale; reselling the property; and meeting conservation goals. Our findings suggest the complexity of these decisions may constrain revolvingfund effectiveness. Drawing from participant responses, we identified potential strategies to mitigate these risks such as providing adequate recreational space without jeopardizing ecological assets. We suggest managers could benefit from a shared-learning and adaptive approach to property selection given the commonalities between programs. Understanding how practitioners deal with complex decisions in the implementation of revolving funds helps identify future research to improve the performance of this conservation tool. Encontrar maneras sustentables de incrementar la cantidad depropiedad privada que proteja a la biodiversidad es un desafío para muchas organizaciones conservación. En algunos países las organizaciones utilizan programas de fondos rotatorios, en los que la tierra es comprada y vendida a propietarios con mentalidad de conservación bajo la condición de que firmen un contrato o usufructo de conservación. Los ingresos de la venta se utilizan para comprar, proteger y vender propiedades adicionales, incrementando la cantidad de propiedad privada protegida. Ya que la efectividad de esta estrategia depende de la selección de propiedades adecuadas, exploramos los factores que actualmente son considerados por los profesionales y cómo éstos están integrados en la toma de decisiones. Realizamos entrevistas exploratorias semi-estructuradas a administradores de cada uno de los cinco principales fondos rotatorios de Australia. Las respuestas indicaron que, aunque los factores de conservación son importantes, los factores sociales y económicos también son muy influyentes. Un determinante sustancial fue si la propiedad podía ser revendida dentro de un periodo razonable a un precio que reponga el financiamiento. Para facilitar la reventa, las propiedades que son seleccionadas continuamente incluyen el potencial de reconstrucción de una vivienda. Los profesionales de la conservación enfrentan compensaciones evidentes entre los factores de conservación, económicos, de amenidades y de otros tipos en la selección de propiedades y tres dificultades notorias: recuperar el costo de adquisición, protección y reventa; revender la propiedad; y cumplir con los objetivos de conservación. Nuestros resultados sugieren que la complejidad de estas decisiones puede limitar la efectividad de losfondos rotatorios. Si partimos de las respuestas de quienes participaron en las entrevistas, podemos identificar estrategias potenciales para mitigar estos riesgos, como proporcionar un espacio recreativo apropiado sin poner en riesgo los bienes ecológicos. Sugerimos que los administradores podrían beneficiarse de un aprendizaje compartido y una estrategia adaptativa para la selección de propiedades dadas las cosas en común entre los programas. Entender cómo los profesionales enfrentan las decisiones complejas en la implementación de los fondos rotatorios ayuda a identificarfuturas investigaciones para mejorar el desempeño de esta herramienta de conservación. 诸多环保组织在设法寻找可持续增加旨在保护生物多祥性的私有土地量方面面临着挑战。在ー些国家 环保组织通过循环基金项目购买土地,然后出售给有环保意识的所有者,条件是他们加入保护公约或约定地役 权。出售所得用于购买、保护以及售卖额外的地产, 以逐步増加私有保护土地的数量。由于这种方法的有效性 依赖于选择合适的地产,我们探讨了决策者目前考虑的因素, 以及这些因素是如何整合到决策中的。我们分别与 澳大利亚5 , 个主要循环基金经理进行了探索性的、半结构化的访谈。访谈显示, 然保护因素是重要的,但经济 和社会因素也有很大影响。ー个主要的决定性因素是地产能否在ー个恰当的时期内被转售用以补充循环基金。 为便于转售,经常选择那些具有建造住宅潜力的地产。决策者面临着保护、资金、便利ñ 施和其它因素之间的 权衡和三个主要困难. 回购置、保护和转售的费用;售卖地产;以及达到保护目标。我们的研究表明,这些决策 的复杂性可能会限制循环基金的有效性。从参与者的反应中,我们找到了减少这些风险的潜在策略,如在不危及 生态资产的情況下提供足够的重建空间。基于循环基金项目的共性,我们认为经理们可以从共享学习和因地制 宜的方法中获益。理解环保实践者在执行循环基金时如何进行复杂的决策,有助于确定未来的研究以改进这ー 保护工具的性能。</description><subject>adquisición</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>comprador de la conservación</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>conservation acquisition</subject><subject>conservation buyer</subject><subject>Conservation organizations</subject><subject>conservation planning</subject><subject>Conservation Practice and Policy</subject><subject>contrato</subject><subject>covenant</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>easement</subject><subject>Easements</subject><subject>Funds</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Performance enhancement</subject><subject>private land conservation</subject><subject>Private property</subject><subject>Privately Protected Areas</subject><subject>Properties</subject><subject>Properties (attributes)</subject><subject>propiedad privada</subject><subject>purchase-protect-resale</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>usufructo</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>áreas protegidas privadas</subject><subject>公约</subject><subject>地役权</subject><subject>环保买家</subject><subject>私有保护地</subject><subject>私有土地</subject><subject>购置</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFLwzAUxoMobk4v3pWCFxE685K0SY463BwMdtk9tGkqHV0zk3Wy_95s3Xbw4Ls8-Pi9j4_vIXQPeAhhXrXNqyEQKeEC9SEhNAZO5SXqYyFELIQkPXTj_RJjLBNg16hHBCcpZbiPJuNMb6zzUdWUdWsaXTVf0drZtXGbXeRNbfSmsk1UWhdp23jjttlBcGZr6-2eLtum8Lfoqsxqb-6Oe4AW44_F6DOezSfT0dss1gwSiAnTMs-yEuOMppQmRY5xHiYVJOFBMZBLkmDOtBEEc8BUmiSnBU8pL5KSDtBzZxsifrfGb9Sq8trUddYY23oFkgCQlIk0oE9_0KVtXRPCKYKBp6lkVATqpaO0s947U6q1q1aZ2ynAat-u2rerDu0G-PFo2eYrU5zRU50BgA74qWqz-8dKjebv05PpQ3ez9OER5xvGJKdCYPoLHqCNoQ</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Hardy, Mathew J.</creator><creator>Fitzsimons, James A.</creator><creator>Bekessy, Sarah A.</creator><creator>Gordon, Ascelin</creator><general>Wiley Blackwell, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0648-0346</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0503-1979</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4277-8040</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7322-7615</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Factors influencing property selection for conservation revolving funds</title><author>Hardy, Mathew J. ; Fitzsimons, James A. ; Bekessy, Sarah A. ; Gordon, Ascelin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4151-24c9baaf00a36335db00bbbb68257363e1b925074ce82071039e5b3d7637d5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>adquisición</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>comprador de la conservación</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>conservation acquisition</topic><topic>conservation buyer</topic><topic>Conservation organizations</topic><topic>conservation planning</topic><topic>Conservation Practice and Policy</topic><topic>contrato</topic><topic>covenant</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>easement</topic><topic>Easements</topic><topic>Funds</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Performance enhancement</topic><topic>private land conservation</topic><topic>Private property</topic><topic>Privately Protected Areas</topic><topic>Properties</topic><topic>Properties (attributes)</topic><topic>propiedad privada</topic><topic>purchase-protect-resale</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>usufructo</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>áreas protegidas privadas</topic><topic>公约</topic><topic>地役权</topic><topic>环保买家</topic><topic>私有保护地</topic><topic>私有土地</topic><topic>购置</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Mathew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzsimons, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bekessy, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Ascelin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hardy, Mathew J.</au><au>Fitzsimons, James A.</au><au>Bekessy, Sarah A.</au><au>Gordon, Ascelin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors influencing property selection for conservation revolving funds</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>276</spage><epage>286</epage><pages>276-286</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><abstract>Finding sustainable ways to increase the amount of private land protected for biodiversity is challenging for many conservation organizations. In some countries, organizations use revolving-fund programs, whereby land is purchased and then sold to conservation-minded owners under condition they enter into a conservation covenant or easement. The sale proceeds are used to purchase, protect, and sell additional properties, incrementally increasing the amount of protected private land. Because the effectiveness of this approach relies on selecting appropriate properties, we explored factors currently considered by practitioners and how these are integrated into decision making. We conducted exploratory, semistructured interviews with managers from each of the 5 major revolving funds in Australia. Responses indicated although conservation factors are important, financial and social factors are also highly influential. A major determinant was whether the property could be resold within a reasonable period at a price that replenishes the fund. To facilitate resale, often selected properties include the potential for the construction of a dwelling. Practitioners face with clear trade-offs between conservation, financial, amenity, and other factors in selecting properties and 3 main challenges: recovering the costs of acquisition, protection, and resale; reselling the property; and meeting conservation goals. Our findings suggest the complexity of these decisions may constrain revolvingfund effectiveness. Drawing from participant responses, we identified potential strategies to mitigate these risks such as providing adequate recreational space without jeopardizing ecological assets. We suggest managers could benefit from a shared-learning and adaptive approach to property selection given the commonalities between programs. Understanding how practitioners deal with complex decisions in the implementation of revolving funds helps identify future research to improve the performance of this conservation tool. Encontrar maneras sustentables de incrementar la cantidad depropiedad privada que proteja a la biodiversidad es un desafío para muchas organizaciones conservación. En algunos países las organizaciones utilizan programas de fondos rotatorios, en los que la tierra es comprada y vendida a propietarios con mentalidad de conservación bajo la condición de que firmen un contrato o usufructo de conservación. Los ingresos de la venta se utilizan para comprar, proteger y vender propiedades adicionales, incrementando la cantidad de propiedad privada protegida. Ya que la efectividad de esta estrategia depende de la selección de propiedades adecuadas, exploramos los factores que actualmente son considerados por los profesionales y cómo éstos están integrados en la toma de decisiones. Realizamos entrevistas exploratorias semi-estructuradas a administradores de cada uno de los cinco principales fondos rotatorios de Australia. Las respuestas indicaron que, aunque los factores de conservación son importantes, los factores sociales y económicos también son muy influyentes. Un determinante sustancial fue si la propiedad podía ser revendida dentro de un periodo razonable a un precio que reponga el financiamiento. Para facilitar la reventa, las propiedades que son seleccionadas continuamente incluyen el potencial de reconstrucción de una vivienda. Los profesionales de la conservación enfrentan compensaciones evidentes entre los factores de conservación, económicos, de amenidades y de otros tipos en la selección de propiedades y tres dificultades notorias: recuperar el costo de adquisición, protección y reventa; revender la propiedad; y cumplir con los objetivos de conservación. Nuestros resultados sugieren que la complejidad de estas decisiones puede limitar la efectividad de losfondos rotatorios. Si partimos de las respuestas de quienes participaron en las entrevistas, podemos identificar estrategias potenciales para mitigar estos riesgos, como proporcionar un espacio recreativo apropiado sin poner en riesgo los bienes ecológicos. Sugerimos que los administradores podrían beneficiarse de un aprendizaje compartido y una estrategia adaptativa para la selección de propiedades dadas las cosas en común entre los programas. Entender cómo los profesionales enfrentan las decisiones complejas en la implementación de los fondos rotatorios ayuda a identificarfuturas investigaciones para mejorar el desempeño de esta herramienta de conservación. 诸多环保组织在设法寻找可持续增加旨在保护生物多祥性的私有土地量方面面临着挑战。在ー些国家 环保组织通过循环基金项目购买土地,然后出售给有环保意识的所有者,条件是他们加入保护公约或约定地役 权。出售所得用于购买、保护以及售卖额外的地产, 以逐步増加私有保护土地的数量。由于这种方法的有效性 依赖于选择合适的地产,我们探讨了决策者目前考虑的因素, 以及这些因素是如何整合到决策中的。我们分别与 澳大利亚5 , 个主要循环基金经理进行了探索性的、半结构化的访谈。访谈显示, 然保护因素是重要的,但经济 和社会因素也有很大影响。ー个主要的决定性因素是地产能否在ー个恰当的时期内被转售用以补充循环基金。 为便于转售,经常选择那些具有建造住宅潜力的地产。决策者面临着保护、资金、便利ñ 施和其它因素之间的 权衡和三个主要困难. 回购置、保护和转售的费用;售卖地产;以及达到保护目标。我们的研究表明,这些决策 的复杂性可能会限制循环基金的有效性。从参与者的反应中,我们找到了减少这些风险的潜在策略,如在不危及 生态资产的情況下提供足够的重建空间。基于循环基金项目的共性,我们认为经理们可以从共享学习和因地制 宜的方法中获益。理解环保实践者在执行循环基金时如何进行复杂的决策,有助于确定未来的研究以改进这ー 保护工具的性能。</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Blackwell, Inc</pub><pmid>28726340</pmid><doi>10.1111/cobi.12991</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0648-0346</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0503-1979</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4277-8040</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7322-7615</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-8892 |
ispartof | Conservation biology, 2018-04, Vol.32 (2), p.276-286 |
issn | 0888-8892 1523-1739 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1921126486 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | adquisición Biodiversity Complexity comprador de la conservación Conservation conservation acquisition conservation buyer Conservation organizations conservation planning Conservation Practice and Policy contrato covenant Decision making Decisions easement Easements Funds Organizations Performance enhancement private land conservation Private property Privately Protected Areas Properties Properties (attributes) propiedad privada purchase-protect-resale Social factors usufructo Wildlife conservation áreas protegidas privadas 公约 地役权 环保买家 私有保护地 私有土地 购置 |
title | Factors influencing property selection for conservation revolving funds |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T04%3A05%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20influencing%20property%20selection%20for%20conservation%20revolving%20funds&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=Hardy,%20Mathew%20J.&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=276&rft.epage=286&rft.pages=276-286&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cobi.12991&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44973880%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2017669438&rft_id=info:pmid/28726340&rft_jstor_id=44973880&rfr_iscdi=true |