Factors influencing property selection for conservation revolving funds
Finding sustainable ways to increase the amount of private land protected for biodiversity is challenging for many conservation organizations. In some countries, organizations use revolving-fund programs, whereby land is purchased and then sold to conservation-minded owners under condition they ente...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Conservation biology 2018-04, Vol.32 (2), p.276-286 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Finding sustainable ways to increase the amount of private land protected for biodiversity is challenging for many conservation organizations. In some countries, organizations use revolving-fund programs, whereby land is purchased and then sold to conservation-minded owners under condition they enter into a conservation covenant or easement. The sale proceeds are used to purchase, protect, and sell additional properties, incrementally increasing the amount of protected private land. Because the effectiveness of this approach relies on selecting appropriate properties, we explored factors currently considered by practitioners and how these are integrated into decision making. We conducted exploratory, semistructured interviews with managers from each of the 5 major revolving funds in Australia. Responses indicated although conservation factors are important, financial and social factors are also highly influential. A major determinant was whether the property could be resold within a reasonable period at a price that replenishes the fund. To facilitate resale, often selected properties include the potential for the construction of a dwelling. Practitioners face with clear trade-offs between conservation, financial, amenity, and other factors in selecting properties and 3 main challenges: recovering the costs of acquisition, protection, and resale; reselling the property; and meeting conservation goals. Our findings suggest the complexity of these decisions may constrain revolvingfund effectiveness. Drawing from participant responses, we identified potential strategies to mitigate these risks such as providing adequate recreational space without jeopardizing ecological assets. We suggest managers could benefit from a shared-learning and adaptive approach to property selection given the commonalities between programs. Understanding how practitioners deal with complex decisions in the implementation of revolving funds helps identify future research to improve the performance of this conservation tool. Encontrar maneras sustentables de incrementar la cantidad depropiedad privada que proteja a la biodiversidad es un desafío para muchas organizaciones conservación. En algunos países las organizaciones utilizan programas de fondos rotatorios, en los que la tierra es comprada y vendida a propietarios con mentalidad de conservación bajo la condición de que firmen un contrato o usufructo de conservación. Los ingresos de la venta se utilizan para comprar, proteger y v |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0888-8892 1523-1739 |
DOI: | 10.1111/cobi.12991 |