Identification of genomic mutations associated with clinical outcomes of induction chemotherapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Purpose We performed deep sequencing of target genes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) tumors to identify somatic mutations that are associated with induction chemotherapy (IC) response. Methods Patients who were diagnosed with HNSCC were retrospectively identified. Patients who were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2016-04, Vol.142 (4), p.873-883
Hauptverfasser: Ock, Chan-Young, Son, Bongjun, Keam, Bhumsuk, Lee, Seung-Youn, Moon, Jaewoo, Kwak, Hwanjong, Kim, Sehui, Kim, Tae Min, Jeon, Yoon Kyung, Kwon, Seong Keun, Hah, J. Hun, Lee, Se-Hoon, Kwon, Tack-Kyun, Kim, Dong-Wan, Wu, Hong-Gyun, Sung, Myung-Whun, Heo, Dae Seog
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose We performed deep sequencing of target genes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) tumors to identify somatic mutations that are associated with induction chemotherapy (IC) response. Methods Patients who were diagnosed with HNSCC were retrospectively identified. Patients who were treated with IC were divided into two groups: good responders and poor responders by tumor response and progression-free survival. Targeted gene sequencing for 2404 somatic mutations of 44 genes was performed on HNSCC tissues. Mutations with total coverage of 10 %. Results Of the 71 patients, 45 were treated upfront with IC. Mean total coverage was 1941 per locus, and 42.2 % of tumors had TP53 mutations. Thirty-three mutations in TP53 , NOTCH3 , FGFR2 , FGFR3 , ATM , EGFR , MET , PTEN , FBXW7 , SYNE1 , and SUFU were frequently altered in poor responders. Among the patients who were treated with IC, those with unfavorable genomic profiles had significantly poorer overall survival than those without unfavorable genomic profiles (hazard ratio 6.45, 95 % confidence interval 2.07–20.10, P  
ISSN:0171-5216
1432-1335
DOI:10.1007/s00432-015-2083-2