PETRA, MSVAT-SPACE and SEMAC sequences for metal artefact reduction in dental MR imaging

Objectives Dental MRI is often impaired by artefacts due to metallic dental materials. Several sequences were developed to reduce susceptibility artefacts. Here, we evaluated a set of sequences for artefact reduction for dental MRI for the first time. Methods Artefact volume, signal-to-noise ratio (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2017-12, Vol.27 (12), p.5104-5112
Hauptverfasser: Hilgenfeld, Tim, Prager, Marcel, Heil, Alexander, Schwindling, Franz Sebastian, Nittka, Mathias, Grodzki, David, Rammelsberg, Peter, Bendszus, Martin, Heiland, Sabine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives Dental MRI is often impaired by artefacts due to metallic dental materials. Several sequences were developed to reduce susceptibility artefacts. Here, we evaluated a set of sequences for artefact reduction for dental MRI for the first time. Methods Artefact volume, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and image quality were assessed on a 3-T MRI for pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA), multiple-slab acquisition with view angle tilting gradient, based on a sampling perfection with application-optimised contrasts using different flip angle evolution (SPACE) sequence (MSVAT-SPACE), slice-encoding for metal-artefact correction (SEMAC) and compared to a standard SPACE and a standard turbo-spin-echo (TSE) sequence. Field-of-view and acquisition times were chosen to enable in vivo application. Two implant-supported prostheses were tested (porcelain fused to metal non-precious alloy and monolithic zirconia). Results Smallest artefact was measured for TSE sequences with no difference between the standard TSE and the SEMAC. MSVAT-SPACE reduced artefacts about 56% compared to the standard SPACE. Effect of the PETRA was dependent on sample used. Image quality and SNR were comparable for all sequences except PETRA, which yielded poor results. Conclusion There is no benefit in terms of artefact reduction for SEMAC compared to standard TSE. Usage of MSVAT-SPACE is advantageous since artefacts are reduced and higher resolution is achieved. Key Points • SEMAC is not superior to TSE in terms of artefact reduction . • MSVAT-SPACE reduces susceptibility artefacts while maintaining comparable image quality . • PETRA reduces susceptibility artefacts depending on material but offers poor image quality
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-017-4901-1