Implementation of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP): comparison of the initial learning curve with the later on clinical routine in a tertiary centre

Objective We report on the comparison of clinical results of the early phase of implementation of minimally invasive PNL (MIP) in a mentor-based approach with the later on clinical routine in a tertiary centre. Patients and methods From January 2010 until January 2015 MIP was performed in 190 patients. Stone and patient characteristics were recorded in prospective manner. Perioperative complications were recorded within the Clavien-Classification. The first 120 consecutive patients undergoing MIP were evaluated and divided into three groups of 40 patients each. Mentor-based introduction of MIP was done within the first 40 patients (group A). Further patients were treated on routine clinical practice basis (group B and C). Treatment outcome was compared within the three groups. Results The groups did not significantly differ with regard to patient characteristics, operation time and decline in haemoglobin. In the mentor-based series mean stone size was 21.7 ± 12.6 vs. 15.6 ± 7.9 and 16.1 ± 8.4 mm in group B and C ( p = 0.033). Primary stone-free rates were 65, 87.5 and 87.5% for the three groups ( p = 0.015). Stone-free rate was higher in smaller and simple stones. Overall, complication rate was 41.7% including 36.7% Clavien grade I and II complications. Conclusions MIP can be implemented safe and effectively with mentor-based approach. MIP has a high safety profile, which allows high safety and efficacy of MIP at the time of implementation.