Work Enabling Opioid Management

OBJECTIVE:This study describes the relationship between opioid prescribing and ability to work. METHODS:The opioid prescription patterns of 4994 claimants were studied. Three groups were constructed1) at least 3 consecutive months prescribed (chronic opioid therapy; COT); 2) less than 3 consecutive...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of occupational and environmental medicine 2017-08, Vol.59 (8), p.761-764
Hauptverfasser: Lavin, Robert A., Kalia, Nimisha, Yuspeh, Larry, Barry, Jill A., Bernacki, Edward J., Tao, Xuguang (Grant)
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVE:This study describes the relationship between opioid prescribing and ability to work. METHODS:The opioid prescription patterns of 4994 claimants were studied. Three groups were constructed1) at least 3 consecutive months prescribed (chronic opioid therapy; COT); 2) less than 3 consecutive months prescribed (acute opioid therapy; AOT); and 3) no opioids prescribed. Variables included sex, age, daily morphine equivalent dose (MED), days opioids were prescribed, temporary total days (TTDs), and medical/indemnity/total costs. RESULTS:The COT versus AOT claimants had higher opioid costs ($8618 vs $94), longer TTD (636.2 vs 182.3), and average MED (66.8 vs 34.9). Only 2% of the COT cohort were not released to work. Fifty-seven percent of patients in the COT category (64 of 112) were released to work while still receiving opioids. CONCLUSION:COT does not preclude ability to work when prescribing within established guidelines.
ISSN:1076-2752
1536-5948
DOI:10.1097/JOM.0000000000001080