Work Enabling Opioid Management
OBJECTIVE:This study describes the relationship between opioid prescribing and ability to work. METHODS:The opioid prescription patterns of 4994 claimants were studied. Three groups were constructed1) at least 3 consecutive months prescribed (chronic opioid therapy; COT); 2) less than 3 consecutive...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of occupational and environmental medicine 2017-08, Vol.59 (8), p.761-764 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVE:This study describes the relationship between opioid prescribing and ability to work.
METHODS:The opioid prescription patterns of 4994 claimants were studied. Three groups were constructed1) at least 3 consecutive months prescribed (chronic opioid therapy; COT); 2) less than 3 consecutive months prescribed (acute opioid therapy; AOT); and 3) no opioids prescribed. Variables included sex, age, daily morphine equivalent dose (MED), days opioids were prescribed, temporary total days (TTDs), and medical/indemnity/total costs.
RESULTS:The COT versus AOT claimants had higher opioid costs ($8618 vs $94), longer TTD (636.2 vs 182.3), and average MED (66.8 vs 34.9). Only 2% of the COT cohort were not released to work. Fifty-seven percent of patients in the COT category (64 of 112) were released to work while still receiving opioids.
CONCLUSION:COT does not preclude ability to work when prescribing within established guidelines. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1076-2752 1536-5948 |
DOI: | 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001080 |