Grazoprevir, ruzasvir, and uprifosbuvir for hepatitis C virus after NS5A treatment failure
People with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who have failed treatment with an all‐oral regimen represent a challenging treatment population. The present studies evaluated the safety and efficacy of grazoprevir, ruzasvir, and uprifosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, in participants who had failed a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 2017-12, Vol.66 (6), p.1794-1804 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | People with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who have failed treatment with an all‐oral regimen represent a challenging treatment population. The present studies evaluated the safety and efficacy of grazoprevir, ruzasvir, and uprifosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, in participants who had failed an NS5A inhibitor‐containing regimen. C‐SURGE (PN‐3682‐021) and C‐CREST Part C (PN‐3682‐011 and ‐012) were open‐label, multicenter studies. Participants who had previously relapsed following an NS5A inhibitor–containing all‐oral regimen were retreated with grazoprevir 100 mg, ruzasvir 60 mg, and uprifosbuvir 450 mg alone for 24 weeks or with ribavirin for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response (HCV RNA below the limit of quantitation [ |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0270-9139 1527-3350 |
DOI: | 10.1002/hep.29358 |