Grazoprevir, ruzasvir, and uprifosbuvir for hepatitis C virus after NS5A treatment failure

People with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who have failed treatment with an all‐oral regimen represent a challenging treatment population. The present studies evaluated the safety and efficacy of grazoprevir, ruzasvir, and uprifosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, in participants who had failed a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 2017-12, Vol.66 (6), p.1794-1804
Hauptverfasser: Wyles, David, Wedemeyer, Heiner, Ben‐Ari, Ziv, Gane, Edward J., Hansen, Jesper Bach, Jacobson, Ira M., Laursen, Alex L., Luetkemeyer, Annie, Nahass, Ronald, Pianko, Stephen, Zeuzem, Stefan, Jumes, Patricia, Huang, Hsueh‐Cheng, Butterton, Joan, Robertson, Michael, Wahl, Janice, Barr, Eliav, Joeng, Hee‐Koung, Martin, Elizabeth, Serfaty, Lawrence
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:People with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who have failed treatment with an all‐oral regimen represent a challenging treatment population. The present studies evaluated the safety and efficacy of grazoprevir, ruzasvir, and uprifosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, in participants who had failed an NS5A inhibitor‐containing regimen. C‐SURGE (PN‐3682‐021) and C‐CREST Part C (PN‐3682‐011 and ‐012) were open‐label, multicenter studies. Participants who had previously relapsed following an NS5A inhibitor–containing all‐oral regimen were retreated with grazoprevir 100 mg, ruzasvir 60 mg, and uprifosbuvir 450 mg alone for 24 weeks or with ribavirin for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response (HCV RNA below the limit of quantitation [
ISSN:0270-9139
1527-3350
DOI:10.1002/hep.29358