Striatal Activation Predicts Differential Therapeutic Responses to Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine

Abstract Objective Methylphenidate has prominent effects in the dopamine-rich striatum that are absent for the selective norepinephrine transporter inhibitor atomoxetine. This study tested whether baseline striatal activation predicts differential response to the two medications in youth with attent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2017-07, Vol.56 (7), p.602-609.e2
Hauptverfasser: Schulz, Kurt P., PhD, Bédard, Anne-Claude V., PhD, Fan, Jin, PhD, Hildebrandt, Thomas B., PsyD, Stein, Mark A., PhD, Ivanov, Iliyan, MD, Halperin, Jeffrey M., PhD, Newcorn, Jeffrey H., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective Methylphenidate has prominent effects in the dopamine-rich striatum that are absent for the selective norepinephrine transporter inhibitor atomoxetine. This study tested whether baseline striatal activation predicts differential response to the two medications in youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Method Thirty-six youth with ADHD performed a go/no-go test during functional magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and were treated with methylphenidate and atomoxetine using a randomized cross-over design. Whole-brain task-related activation was regressed on clinical response. Results Task-related activation in right caudate nucleus was predicted by an interaction of clinical responses to methylphenidate and atomoxetine (F1,30 = 17.00; p < .001). Elevated caudate activation was associated with robust improvement for methylphenidate and little improvement for atomoxetine. Rate of robust response was higher for methylphenidate than atomoxetine in youth with high (94.4% versus 38.8%; p = .003; number needed to treat = 2, 95% CI 1.31 – 3.73) but not low caudate activation (33.3% versus 50.0%; p = .375). Further, response to atomoxetine predicted motor cortex activation (F1,30 = 14.99; p < .001). Conclusion Enhanced caudate activation for response inhibition may be a candidate biomarker of superior response to methylphenidate over atomoxetine in youth with ADHD, purportedly reflecting the dopaminergic effects of methylphenidate but not atomoxetine in striatum, while motor cortex activation may predict response to atomoxetine. These data do not yet translate directly to the clinical setting, but the approach is potentially important for informing future research and illustrates that it may be possible to predict differential treatment response using a biomarker-driven approach. Clinical trial registration information —Stimulant Versus Nonstimulant Medication for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ; NCT00183391.
ISSN:0890-8567
1527-5418
DOI:10.1016/j.jaac.2017.04.005