Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with psoriasis who have an inadequate response to ustekinumab: results of the randomized, double‐blind, phase III NAVIGATE trial
Summary Background Guselkumab, an anti‐interleukin‐23 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated significant efficacy in phase III psoriasis trials. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis who had an inadequate response to ustekinu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of dermatology (1951) 2018-01, Vol.178 (1), p.114-123 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 123 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 114 |
| container_title | British journal of dermatology (1951) |
| container_volume | 178 |
| creator | Langley, R.G. Tsai, T.‐F. Flavin, S. Song, M. Randazzo, B. Wasfi, Y. Jiang, J. Li, S. Puig, L. |
| description | Summary
Background
Guselkumab, an anti‐interleukin‐23 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated significant efficacy in phase III psoriasis trials.
Objectives
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis who had an inadequate response to ustekinumab.
Methods
In this phase III, randomized, double‐blind study, 871 patients received open‐label ustekinumab (45 mg or 90 mg) at weeks 0 and 4. At week 16, 268 patients with an inadequate response to ustekinumab [Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) ≥ 2] were randomized (double‐blind) to guselkumab 100 mg or to continue ustekinumab; 585 of 871 patients (67%) with IGA 0/1 at week 16 continued open‐label ustekinumab. The primary end point was the number of visits at which randomized patients achieved IGA 0/1 and at least a two‐grade improvement (from week 16) from week 28 to week 40. Improvement ≥ 90% or 100% in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90/100) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0/1 were also assessed.
Results
The mean number of visits at which patients achieved IGA 0/1 and at least a two‐grade improvemen (week 28–40) was significantly greater in the guselkumab group vs. the randomized ustekinumab group (1·5 vs. 0·7; P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/bjd.15750 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1912194781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1989567480</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-c29dca482c736837ceffa8e217777ba030e6624f3cc0d67e76fd18cc9f865d863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhwAsgS1xAIq0dbxKH21KWElTBpXCNHHtMvM3GaWxTLScegUfhmXgSZtnCAYm5WCN__mbkn5DHnJ1wrNNuY054URXsDllwURZZzoW4SxaMsSpjdSmOyIMQNoxxwQp2nxzlshQF43JBfqytdVrpHVWjoUFZiDvqLf2cAgxXaas66kY6qehgjIHeuNjTKfjZqeCw7T3t1RfAx4gpA9dJRaAzhMmPAWj0NIUIV27cm17uL9KAGhwQe-Rwpt-6r2BeUONTN8DPb9-7wY3YT71CQdM09P3qU3O-ulzTiFOHh-SeVUOAR7fnMfn4Zn159ja7-HDenK0uMi2kZJnOa6PVUua6EqUUlQZrlYScV1idYoJBWeZLK7RmpqygKq3hUuvayrIw-D3H5NnBO83-OkGI7dYFDcOgRvAptLzmOa-XleSIPv0H3fg0j7gdUrIuymopGVLPD5SefQgz2Haa3VbNu5azdh9jizG2v2NE9smtMXVbMH_JP7khcHoAbtwAu_-b2lfvXh-UvwD8H6lF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1989567480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with psoriasis who have an inadequate response to ustekinumab: results of the randomized, double‐blind, phase III NAVIGATE trial</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Langley, R.G. ; Tsai, T.‐F. ; Flavin, S. ; Song, M. ; Randazzo, B. ; Wasfi, Y. ; Jiang, J. ; Li, S. ; Puig, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Langley, R.G. ; Tsai, T.‐F. ; Flavin, S. ; Song, M. ; Randazzo, B. ; Wasfi, Y. ; Jiang, J. ; Li, S. ; Puig, L.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Background
Guselkumab, an anti‐interleukin‐23 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated significant efficacy in phase III psoriasis trials.
Objectives
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis who had an inadequate response to ustekinumab.
Methods
In this phase III, randomized, double‐blind study, 871 patients received open‐label ustekinumab (45 mg or 90 mg) at weeks 0 and 4. At week 16, 268 patients with an inadequate response to ustekinumab [Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) ≥ 2] were randomized (double‐blind) to guselkumab 100 mg or to continue ustekinumab; 585 of 871 patients (67%) with IGA 0/1 at week 16 continued open‐label ustekinumab. The primary end point was the number of visits at which randomized patients achieved IGA 0/1 and at least a two‐grade improvement (from week 16) from week 28 to week 40. Improvement ≥ 90% or 100% in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90/100) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0/1 were also assessed.
Results
The mean number of visits at which patients achieved IGA 0/1 and at least a two‐grade improvemen (week 28–40) was significantly greater in the guselkumab group vs. the randomized ustekinumab group (1·5 vs. 0·7; P < 0·001); greater proportions of patients in the guselkumab group achieved IGA 0/1 and at least a two‐grade improvement at week 28 (31·1% vs. 14·3%; P = 0·001) and week 52 (36·3% vs. 17·3%; P < 0·001). Greater proportions of patients treated with guselkumab achieved PASI 90, PASI 100 and DLQI 0/1 at week 52. After week 16, 64·4% of patients in the guselkumab group and 55·6% in the ustekinumab group had at least one adverse event (AE); infections were the most frequent AE type. Overall, 6·7% (n = 9) of patients in the guselkumab group had at least one serious AE compared with 4·5% (n = 6) for the ustekinumab group.
Conclusions
Patients treated with ustekinumab who did not achieve an IGA of 0/1 by week 16 derived significant benefit from switching to guselkumab.
What's already known about this topic?
Interleukin (IL)‐23/IL‐17 is the major pathway that drives the chronic inflammation underlying the pathophysiology of psoriasis.
Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting IL‐12 and IL‐23 and is currently approved for patients with plaque psoriasis.
Guselkumab is a novel anti‐IL‐23 monoclonal antibody and has demonstrated high efficacy in patients with plaque psoriasis in two recent phase III trials.
What does this study add?
Guselkumab demonstrated greater efficacy compared with ustekinumab among patients who failed to achieve an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 with ustekinumab therapy.
The types of adverse events (AEs) with guselkumab and ustekinumab were similar, with infections being the most common.
A slightly higher incidence of AEs was reported in the guselkumab group, primarily driven by AEs of back pain, psoriatic arthropathy and mild injection site reactions.
Linked Comment: Albrecht and Gerdes. Br J Dermatol 2018; 178:20.
Plain language summary available online</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15750</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28635018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - administration & dosage ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - adverse effects ; Biological Products - administration & dosage ; Biological Products - adverse effects ; Clinical trials ; Cytokines ; Dermatologic Agents - administration & dosage ; Dermatologic Agents - adverse effects ; Double-Blind Method ; Double-blind studies ; Drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin A ; Immunotherapy ; Interleukin 12 ; Interleukin 17 ; Interleukin 23 ; Male ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Pain ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Psoriasis ; Psoriasis - drug therapy ; Side effects ; Treatment Outcome ; Ustekinumab - administration & dosage ; Ustekinumab - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>British journal of dermatology (1951), 2018-01, Vol.178 (1), p.114-123</ispartof><rights>2017 British Association of Dermatologists</rights><rights>2017 British Association of Dermatologists.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 British Association of Dermatologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-c29dca482c736837ceffa8e217777ba030e6624f3cc0d67e76fd18cc9f865d863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-c29dca482c736837ceffa8e217777ba030e6624f3cc0d67e76fd18cc9f865d863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbjd.15750$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbjd.15750$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28635018$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Langley, R.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, T.‐F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flavin, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randazzo, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasfi, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puig, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with psoriasis who have an inadequate response to ustekinumab: results of the randomized, double‐blind, phase III NAVIGATE trial</title><title>British journal of dermatology (1951)</title><addtitle>Br J Dermatol</addtitle><description>Summary
Background
Guselkumab, an anti‐interleukin‐23 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated significant efficacy in phase III psoriasis trials.
Objectives
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis who had an inadequate response to ustekinumab.
Methods
In this phase III, randomized, double‐blind study, 871 patients received open‐label ustekinumab (45 mg or 90 mg) at weeks 0 and 4. At week 16, 268 patients with an inadequate response to ustekinumab [Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) ≥ 2] were randomized (double‐blind) to guselkumab 100 mg or to continue ustekinumab; 585 of 871 patients (67%) with IGA 0/1 at week 16 continued open‐label ustekinumab. The primary end point was the number of visits at which randomized patients achieved IGA 0/1 and at least a two‐grade improvement (from week 16) from week 28 to week 40. Improvement ≥ 90% or 100% in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90/100) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0/1 were also assessed.
Results
The mean number of visits at which patients achieved IGA 0/1 and at least a two‐grade improvemen (week 28–40) was significantly greater in the guselkumab group vs. the randomized ustekinumab group (1·5 vs. 0·7; P < 0·001); greater proportions of patients in the guselkumab group achieved IGA 0/1 and at least a two‐grade improvement at week 28 (31·1% vs. 14·3%; P = 0·001) and week 52 (36·3% vs. 17·3%; P < 0·001). Greater proportions of patients treated with guselkumab achieved PASI 90, PASI 100 and DLQI 0/1 at week 52. After week 16, 64·4% of patients in the guselkumab group and 55·6% in the ustekinumab group had at least one adverse event (AE); infections were the most frequent AE type. Overall, 6·7% (n = 9) of patients in the guselkumab group had at least one serious AE compared with 4·5% (n = 6) for the ustekinumab group.
Conclusions
Patients treated with ustekinumab who did not achieve an IGA of 0/1 by week 16 derived significant benefit from switching to guselkumab.
What's already known about this topic?
Interleukin (IL)‐23/IL‐17 is the major pathway that drives the chronic inflammation underlying the pathophysiology of psoriasis.
Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting IL‐12 and IL‐23 and is currently approved for patients with plaque psoriasis.
Guselkumab is a novel anti‐IL‐23 monoclonal antibody and has demonstrated high efficacy in patients with plaque psoriasis in two recent phase III trials.
What does this study add?
Guselkumab demonstrated greater efficacy compared with ustekinumab among patients who failed to achieve an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 with ustekinumab therapy.
The types of adverse events (AEs) with guselkumab and ustekinumab were similar, with infections being the most common.
A slightly higher incidence of AEs was reported in the guselkumab group, primarily driven by AEs of back pain, psoriatic arthropathy and mild injection site reactions.
Linked Comment: Albrecht and Gerdes. Br J Dermatol 2018; 178:20.
Plain language summary available online</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Biological Products - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Biological Products - adverse effects</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cytokines</subject><subject>Dermatologic Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Dermatologic Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Double-blind studies</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin A</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Interleukin 12</subject><subject>Interleukin 17</subject><subject>Interleukin 23</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Psoriasis</subject><subject>Psoriasis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ustekinumab - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Ustekinumab - adverse effects</subject><issn>0007-0963</issn><issn>1365-2133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhwAsgS1xAIq0dbxKH21KWElTBpXCNHHtMvM3GaWxTLScegUfhmXgSZtnCAYm5WCN__mbkn5DHnJ1wrNNuY054URXsDllwURZZzoW4SxaMsSpjdSmOyIMQNoxxwQp2nxzlshQF43JBfqytdVrpHVWjoUFZiDvqLf2cAgxXaas66kY6qehgjIHeuNjTKfjZqeCw7T3t1RfAx4gpA9dJRaAzhMmPAWj0NIUIV27cm17uL9KAGhwQe-Rwpt-6r2BeUONTN8DPb9-7wY3YT71CQdM09P3qU3O-ulzTiFOHh-SeVUOAR7fnMfn4Zn159ja7-HDenK0uMi2kZJnOa6PVUua6EqUUlQZrlYScV1idYoJBWeZLK7RmpqygKq3hUuvayrIw-D3H5NnBO83-OkGI7dYFDcOgRvAptLzmOa-XleSIPv0H3fg0j7gdUrIuymopGVLPD5SefQgz2Haa3VbNu5azdh9jizG2v2NE9smtMXVbMH_JP7khcHoAbtwAu_-b2lfvXh-UvwD8H6lF</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Langley, R.G.</creator><creator>Tsai, T.‐F.</creator><creator>Flavin, S.</creator><creator>Song, M.</creator><creator>Randazzo, B.</creator><creator>Wasfi, Y.</creator><creator>Jiang, J.</creator><creator>Li, S.</creator><creator>Puig, L.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with psoriasis who have an inadequate response to ustekinumab: results of the randomized, double‐blind, phase III NAVIGATE trial</title><author>Langley, R.G. ; Tsai, T.‐F. ; Flavin, S. ; Song, M. ; Randazzo, B. ; Wasfi, Y. ; Jiang, J. ; Li, S. ; Puig, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-c29dca482c736837ceffa8e217777ba030e6624f3cc0d67e76fd18cc9f865d863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Biological Products - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Biological Products - adverse effects</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cytokines</topic><topic>Dermatologic Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Dermatologic Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Double-blind studies</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin A</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Interleukin 12</topic><topic>Interleukin 17</topic><topic>Interleukin 23</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Psoriasis</topic><topic>Psoriasis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ustekinumab - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Ustekinumab - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Langley, R.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, T.‐F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flavin, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randazzo, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasfi, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puig, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of dermatology (1951)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Langley, R.G.</au><au>Tsai, T.‐F.</au><au>Flavin, S.</au><au>Song, M.</au><au>Randazzo, B.</au><au>Wasfi, Y.</au><au>Jiang, J.</au><au>Li, S.</au><au>Puig, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with psoriasis who have an inadequate response to ustekinumab: results of the randomized, double‐blind, phase III NAVIGATE trial</atitle><jtitle>British journal of dermatology (1951)</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Dermatol</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>178</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>114</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>114-123</pages><issn>0007-0963</issn><eissn>1365-2133</eissn><abstract>Summary
Background
Guselkumab, an anti‐interleukin‐23 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated significant efficacy in phase III psoriasis trials.
Objectives
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis who had an inadequate response to ustekinumab.
Methods
In this phase III, randomized, double‐blind study, 871 patients received open‐label ustekinumab (45 mg or 90 mg) at weeks 0 and 4. At week 16, 268 patients with an inadequate response to ustekinumab [Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) ≥ 2] were randomized (double‐blind) to guselkumab 100 mg or to continue ustekinumab; 585 of 871 patients (67%) with IGA 0/1 at week 16 continued open‐label ustekinumab. The primary end point was the number of visits at which randomized patients achieved IGA 0/1 and at least a two‐grade improvement (from week 16) from week 28 to week 40. Improvement ≥ 90% or 100% in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90/100) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0/1 were also assessed.
Results
The mean number of visits at which patients achieved IGA 0/1 and at least a two‐grade improvemen (week 28–40) was significantly greater in the guselkumab group vs. the randomized ustekinumab group (1·5 vs. 0·7; P < 0·001); greater proportions of patients in the guselkumab group achieved IGA 0/1 and at least a two‐grade improvement at week 28 (31·1% vs. 14·3%; P = 0·001) and week 52 (36·3% vs. 17·3%; P < 0·001). Greater proportions of patients treated with guselkumab achieved PASI 90, PASI 100 and DLQI 0/1 at week 52. After week 16, 64·4% of patients in the guselkumab group and 55·6% in the ustekinumab group had at least one adverse event (AE); infections were the most frequent AE type. Overall, 6·7% (n = 9) of patients in the guselkumab group had at least one serious AE compared with 4·5% (n = 6) for the ustekinumab group.
Conclusions
Patients treated with ustekinumab who did not achieve an IGA of 0/1 by week 16 derived significant benefit from switching to guselkumab.
What's already known about this topic?
Interleukin (IL)‐23/IL‐17 is the major pathway that drives the chronic inflammation underlying the pathophysiology of psoriasis.
Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting IL‐12 and IL‐23 and is currently approved for patients with plaque psoriasis.
Guselkumab is a novel anti‐IL‐23 monoclonal antibody and has demonstrated high efficacy in patients with plaque psoriasis in two recent phase III trials.
What does this study add?
Guselkumab demonstrated greater efficacy compared with ustekinumab among patients who failed to achieve an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 with ustekinumab therapy.
The types of adverse events (AEs) with guselkumab and ustekinumab were similar, with infections being the most common.
A slightly higher incidence of AEs was reported in the guselkumab group, primarily driven by AEs of back pain, psoriatic arthropathy and mild injection site reactions.
Linked Comment: Albrecht and Gerdes. Br J Dermatol 2018; 178:20.
Plain language summary available online</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>28635018</pmid><doi>10.1111/bjd.15750</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0007-0963 |
| ispartof | British journal of dermatology (1951), 2018-01, Vol.178 (1), p.114-123 |
| issn | 0007-0963 1365-2133 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1912194781 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Adult Antibodies, Monoclonal - administration & dosage Antibodies, Monoclonal - adverse effects Biological Products - administration & dosage Biological Products - adverse effects Clinical trials Cytokines Dermatologic Agents - administration & dosage Dermatologic Agents - adverse effects Double-Blind Method Double-blind studies Drug therapy Female Humans Immunoglobulin A Immunotherapy Interleukin 12 Interleukin 17 Interleukin 23 Male Monoclonal antibodies Pain Patient Reported Outcome Measures Psoriasis Psoriasis - drug therapy Side effects Treatment Outcome Ustekinumab - administration & dosage Ustekinumab - adverse effects |
| title | Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with psoriasis who have an inadequate response to ustekinumab: results of the randomized, double‐blind, phase III NAVIGATE trial |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T21%3A26%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20guselkumab%20in%20patients%20with%20psoriasis%20who%20have%20an%20inadequate%20response%20to%20ustekinumab:%20results%20of%20the%20randomized,%20double%E2%80%90blind,%20phase%20III%20NAVIGATE%20trial&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20dermatology%20(1951)&rft.au=Langley,%20R.G.&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=178&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=114&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=114-123&rft.issn=0007-0963&rft.eissn=1365-2133&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bjd.15750&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1989567480%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1989567480&rft_id=info:pmid/28635018&rfr_iscdi=true |